Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Congratulations ASCILITE conference success

ASCILITE is the premier academic and practitioner conference in higher education digital technologies. This year was the first time DER members were able to attend for 3 years.

Prof Michael Henderson was awarded Life Member in 2021, but received it in person this year. Michael is the 16th awardee in the 37 years ofthe association. It is in recognition of sustained and outstanding service to the ASCILITE community, particularly in leadership around its scholarly direction and activities.

FloraDER also congratulates Hua (Flora) Jin for her Best Paper award. Flora is a research student with our colleagues in COLAM, including DER member Yi-Shan Tsai. The paper on learning analytics and feedback can be read here.

Congratulations as well to Josephine Hook and team (includng DER member Prof Michael Henderson) for second place for the Poster awards. The poster builds on their chapter and explores the themes and implications surrouding Educational Design creative risk taking. You can read more about the chapter and see the poster here.

Digital literacies for refugees and migrants

Digital literacies for people from refugee backgrounds have been widely recognized as critically important for settlement and employment.

This project set out to generate new knowledge in the fields of digital literacies and TESOL by developing and piloting a much-needed conceptual framework for understanding the pedagogical principles for effective teaching of digital literacies to adult refugee and migrant English language learners.

Our project team worked with the Australian Department of Home Affairs, LWA, educators and adult learners to develop the AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide.

.

AMEP Digital Literacies Framework

Teaching digital literacies in adult EAL programs requires appropriate pedagogies.

The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework positions digital literacies as a crucial part of settlement and emphasises that learning digital literacies and English should sit together. The Framework further identifies the four key principles that inform the development of digital literacies pedagogies that connect to the world of adult learners.

Resources for AMEP providers and teachers

The research project resulted in a number of practical resources for AMEP sector and practitioners.

This video explains the framework and resources below

 


The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide

Link
https://doi.org/10.26180/20493207.v3

About
This resource explains the notion of digital literacies, introduces a pedagogical framework for teaching digital literacies in adult EAL settings and presents 15 teaching units with a range of teaching ideas and loosely sequenced scaffolding activities which allows educators to:

    • connect learning units both to The EAL Framework, syllabus and to learners’ lives to achieve multiple learning objectives
    • adapt learning units for specific teaching contexts by modifying the tasks
    • adjust the level of challenge through different levels of scaffolded support, depending on learners’ strengths and needs
    • innovate by organising learning activities in different ways
    • use The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide as a model for developing new learning units

How to cite
Tour, K., Creely, E., Waterhouse, P., & Henderson, M. (2022). AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide. Monash University. https://doi.org/10.26180/20493207.v3


The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide – Teaching resources

Link
https://doi.org/10.26180/20502417.v1

About
This booklet includes teaching resources which were designed and piloted by EAL teachers, with their learners participating in this research project. This booklet does not attempt to address all of the units in The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide; however, these resources do relate directly to five units. These teaching resources illustrate how The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide can be used in practice, and each of these lesson plans includes:

    • a link to The EAL Framework;
    • a sequence of lessons outlining procedures and activities;
    • relevant teaching materials, including worksheets, discussion questions and instructional videos created by teachers;
    • links to The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and its key principles.

How to cite
Tour, K., Creely, E., Waterhouse, P., & Henderson, M. (2022). AMEP Digital Literacies: Teaching Resources. Monash University. https://doi.org/10.26180/20502417.v1


Digital Literacies Diagnostic Tool

Link
https://doi.org/10.26180/20502435.v1 [PDF]

About
This diagnostic tool is a form of diagnostic assessment that enables teachers to gather important information about the current digital literacy practices of learners and assess their strengths, needs and aspirations related to digital literacies. This information can then be used to guide subsequent planning for the effective teaching of digital literacies. At the heart of the tool is a process of teachers knowing their learners to enable best practice planning for teaching.

How to Cite
Tour, K., Creely, E., Waterhouse, P., & Henderson, M. (2022). Digital Literacies Diagnostic (DLD) Tool. Monash University. https://doi.org/10.26180/20502435.v1

What are digital literacies?

The concept of digital literacies is defined and understood in many different ways, depending on theoretical orientations and educational purposes. The AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide is based on the proposition that there is no one universal form of digital literacy easily transferable from one context to another. Rather, different contexts, social purposes and technologies will require a range of skills, knowledge and understandings. From this perspective, digital literacies are defined as purposeful and critical practices involving multimodal reading, writing, creating, communicating and viewing with digital technologies.

Examples of digital literacy practices are numerous, and new ones continue to emerge as technologies develop and people go about their lives (Jones & Hafner, 2021). Thus, it is impossible to list all digital literacy practices that people engage in. A useful starting point may be thinking about digital literacies as language (and non-language) activities that people practise in different digital environments, for specific social purposes and across different social contexts (Tour, 2020).

Some examples of digital literacy practices include:

  • Accessing and viewing meaningfully a cooking tutorial on YouTube
  • Navigating to and reading sport news on The Age webpage
  • Completing an online form on HotDocs to book a medical appointment
  • Text messaging a real estate agent to organise a property inspection
  • Sending an email to a child’s teacher about absence
  • Planning a car trip to Ikea using Google Maps
  • Downloading personal immunisation history on the Medicare platform

Learning digital literacies is an ongoing and lifelong process. Therefore, the role of the formal learning settings is to prepare students for the evolving nature of digital literacies rather than just focus on skills development.

The more exposure to different digital literacy practices learners have, the more confident they become to independently engage in new practices that will be continuously emerging in their lives (Rowsell et al., 2017).

About the project

This project set out to generate new knowledge in the fields of digital literacies and TESOL by developing and piloting a much-needed conceptual framework for understanding the pedagogical principles for effective teaching of digital literacies to adult refugee and migrant English language learners.

The importance of digital literacies for settlement and employment of people from refugee and migrant backgrounds has been widely recognised. However, there is scarce research about the digital needs of this vulnerable group of learners as they settle in Australia. There is a need for a conceptually rigorous and research-informed approach to the teaching of digital literacies within adult EAL contexts.

Using multiple comparative case study, this three-phase research project has been designed to:

  1. contribute new understanding of the critical factors hindering and supporting digital literacy practices of these learners for settlement and employment; and
  2. develop a evidence based resource, the AMEP Digital Literacies Framework and Guide.

The aim is to support the work of AMEP institutions and teachers aspiring to equip their learners with a useful repertoire of digital literacies required for settlement and gaining employment in Australia.

AMEP project infographic

Project team

Dr Katrina Tour

Katrina’s research focuses on the digital literacies of children and adults from refugee and migrant backgrounds. She investigates the ways in which these groups use digital technologies in English as an Additional Language (EAL) for life, learning and employment, and explores how these experiences can be used to enhance educational policies and pedagogies for digital literacies in EAL/TESOL settings.

Dr Ed Creely

Ed has wide ranging experience in education from primary and secondary to tertiary and adult education. His current projects include academic wellbeing, digital literacies for adults from migrant and refugee backgrounds, creativity and literacy practices in the middle years.

Peter Waterhouse

Dr Peter Waterhouse

Peter is an experienced adult educator, lecturer, manager, consultant and researcher with an established track record in teaching and research relating to adult learning, adult literacy, work, skills, and workplace change.

Xuan Pham

Dr Xuan Pham

Dr Xuan Pham joined this project as a research assistant. Dr Pham has expertise in adult education, with a focus on educational identities and differences in relation to gender, ethnicity and migration. She is also interested in critical English language and literacy, with a particular attention to the dynamic power relations that have shaped the positioning of the language, literacy and experiences of those stakeholders involved.

Professor Michael Henderson

Michael is a senior leader and scholar in the field of digital education. Unique to his profile is that his research spans early childhood, schools, universities, professional and informal learning contexts. His current research projects are generally aligned with the three broad fields: assessment and feedback, risk (wellbeing and creativity), and effective teaching and learning with online technologies.

Monash’s Faculty of Education (and the DER group) and Padova University (UNIPD) partner up!

As researchers and educators, we often feel ambivalent towards the constant emphasis on impact that dominates many discussions in the academy. We understand that scholarship is meaningless if it fails to engage with history and the material world, but often find the rhetoric that surrounds impact frustrating and leaning towards anti-intellectualism..

We all want to make the world a better place but the tools at our disposal, while analytically sharp, are not exactly known for their political power. Having a clear strategic direction, in touch with current debates but also committed to the peculiar knowledge-seeking nature of the modern University, certainly helps. And yet, it is not entirely clear how the big issues of our time can be turned into impact-generating research problems that lend themselves to the sort of intellectual work we do.

Aware of these challenges, researchers at Monash University and the University of Padova (Padua) have come together. We are two groups of like-minded scholars active in contiguous disciplinary fields, such as education, media studies and youth studies. Our goal is simple: to explore theoretical ideas and methods that will help us develop a much-needed international perspective on similar research problems.

Our small collaboration has even a name: what can STS do for us? STS stands for Science and Technology Studies, and it refers to a broad field of research that examines how technical/scientific innovations shape and are shaped by society and culture. It felt like a sensible choice for our project, on account of the prominent role of science and technology in many of the phenomena we study.  This is not the place to extol the virtues of STS – suffice it to say that there is a certain openness to theoretical and methodological experimentation in this space that feels suited to our interests around the digitally mediated lives of young people: their entanglement with digital platforms in and out of school, their sense of networked belonging, their digitally expressed gender identities, their growing sense of environmental and geopolitical anxiety, and so forth.

On the Monash side, the collaboration involves some researchers from the Digital Education Research (DER) –  hence this post published here – and Monash staff who may not have a direct stake in digital technology but are still interested in productive frameworks that can nurture cross-disciplinarity and inclusiveness. On the Padova side, the research unit Padova Science, Technology and Innovation Studies (Pa.S.T.I.S.) will be involved.

The seeds are being planted – this brief post is just to introduce the collaboration. We will communicate more through various social media channels as plans will begin to take shape. The collaboration will bear fruits further down the line in the form of published outputs and events, and hopefully will lead to larger initiatives with the involvement of civil society and policy: watch this and other spaces on the internet!

Check out some of our profiles herehere and here.

This project is also aligned with the Shaping Digital Futures research priority in the Faculty of Education at Monash– read more about it here.

❌
❌