Since the pandemic, the urgency of designing and scaling evidence-based products to support learning recovery has become more pronounced. Educational institutions are grappling with unprecedented disruptions and widening achievement gaps, making the need for effective, research-backed interventions critical. The focus is not only on creating these products but also ensuring they are adopted and effectively implemented in schools and classrooms across the country.

The Leveraging Evidence to Accelerate Recovery Nationwide (LEARN) Network, funded by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences, is at the forefront of this effort. Led by SRI International, a nonprofit with a strong track record of bringing innovations to market, the LEARN Network focuses on promoting learning growth by enhancing the use of evidence-based educational products.

The Network also comprises four product teams dedicated to adapting and positioning evidence-based products that boost literacy and math learning to make them more useful and accessible for educators. By providing learning and coaching opportunities, the LEARN Network aims to build the capacity of these teams and others in the field to equitably and sustainably scale educational products. This involves understanding educators’ problems of practice and needs and systems decision-making processes in product procurement, and developing tools for researchers, developers and educators to support the widespread adoption of effective solutions.

Recently, EdSurge spoke with education researchers Kerry Friedman and Jessica Mislevy about the importance of integrating evidence-based practices, educator input and a systems lens from the earliest stages of product development. Friedman, a former teacher with 12 years of experience in research and technical assistance, focuses on strengthening educators' and system leaders' ability to use evidence in practice. As the project director for the LEARN Network, she works with researchers and developers on capacity building and design of evidence-based products and programs. Mislevy is the director of digital learning and technology policy at SRI Education, specializing in mixed-methods evaluations of products designed to improve student outcomes in K-12 and post-secondary education. She is a co-principal investigator with the LEARN Network, focusing on educators’ effective adoption and scaling of evidence-based practices and programs.

EdSurge: Why are evidence-based products and programs so vital, especially at this point in time in America’s schools?

Mislevy: We've all seen how the COVID-19 pandemic upended education systems across the country, interrupting learning for students and exacerbating existing inequalities in education. We're seeing this reflected in the 2022 data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress with the first-ever decline recorded in mathematics and the largest average score decline in reading in decades. Research shows that the quality of learning products and programs matters for student outcomes. Now more than ever, it's important to get those products that can improve education outcomes for all learners and eliminate persistent achievement gaps in districts and schools. Unfortunately, many effective products don't reach educators due to an overwhelming supply of products. It can be hard to select products that are effective and well-matched to students' needs and contexts, as well as affordable and easy to use.

What key considerations should researchers and developers keep in mind while designing and scaling products and programs?

Friedman: When considering scale, researchers often view it as the final step. However, designing a scalable innovation begins with the initial idea. This is where our framework for the LEARN Network starts. We adapted SRI International's Invent-Apply-Transition (I-A-T) framework to better fit the education sector, incorporating Liberatory Design principles focused on equity and systems thinking.

Both the I-A-T framework and Liberatory Design emphasize the importance of understanding users' needs from the start. This understanding forms the foundation of the Invent stage of the I-A-T framework. In the Apply stage, you assess the broader market, identifying key players, infrastructure, policies, and competition to refine your innovation. Finally, in the Transition phase, you consider how to scale your product, envisioning it at a systems level and exploring pathways to create a financially viable approach.

We created the Learn to Scale Toolkit to guide researchers through these stages and support the scaling process. We also profiled various products on their journeys from development to scale in our Stories of Scaling.

How is the Network working to increase the use of evidence-based products and programs in schools?

Mislevy: We're coming at it from both the supply and the demand side. On the supply side, the LEARN Network provides capacity building to researchers and developers in scaling their evidence-based products. So we support them in adapting their products while considering educator context, decision-making processes and usability. This has included a mix of one-on-one and cross-team coaching and consultation sessions to provide tools and training while also supporting and promoting team building and collaboration. In addition to SRI scaling experts, we also bring together other expert voices to contribute to these conversations. Then on the demand side, we're working to better understand the needs and barriers that educators face in adopting and scaling evidence-based products. We translate these findings into actionable takeaways for developers to ensure their products are more likely to be adopted and scaled.

Does the Network have any insights into school and district needs or how they select programs and products?

Free LEARN Network resources for researchers, developers and educators:

• The LEARN to Scale Toolkit: a comprehensive resource for researchers and developers based on the Invent-Apply-Transition framework
• Stories of Scaling: a profile series highlighting impactful researchers, entrepreneurs and evidence-based products
• The LEARN Network Blog: articles, podcasts and Q&As featuring experts and thought leaders from across the U.S.
• LEARN Network Research: action-oriented research briefs focused on product development, procurement and more

Mislevy: The LEARN Network conducted a focused study on K-12 education procurement practices to better understand how decision-makers determine which products to adopt in their schools and districts and how evidence is used in those decisions. We conducted in-depth interviews with a broad array of education leaders and other education stakeholders, and also conducted nationally representative surveys of public school and district leaders through the RAND American Educator Panels. We examined what motivates schools and districts to procure products, who is involved in the decision-making process and what sources of information leaders look to when selecting products. For example, we found that routine curriculum review cycles often motivated educators to procure core curriculum materials, whereas reviews of student outcome data more often led to the procurement of supplemental materials.

We also saw that teachers are reported as most involved in identifying and evaluating prospective products for their schools and districts, while school and district leaders are more involved in making final decisions about which products to select. In terms of usage, research and evidence were amongst the more influential sources for informing procurement decisions, though we found that recommendations from fellow education leaders and end users actually ranked higher. Our research has important implications for product developers so they really understand the systemic forces that influence when and why products are procured, as well as who is involved throughout that procurement process to increase the likelihood of product uptake and scale. We recently published on the LEARN Network website the first of several planned research briefs, which features lessons for developers ready to bring their products to market or scale to broader audiences.

The information reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305N220012 to SRI International. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.

The post Policy Manager from Diligent appeared first on EdTech Digest.

Sometimes, it takes an unlikely friendship to change the world.

For American education, one of those alliances started in the early 20th century. That’s when a ludicrously successful retailer-turned-philanthropist, Julius Rosenwald, met the prominent educator Booker T. Washington. The pair decided to work together, hoping to improve education for Black students in the segregated South. Their collaboration created nearly 5,000 “Rosenwald Schools” — across 15 Southern and border states — between 1917 and 1937.

By some accounts, this was a massive success.

These schools caused a “sharp narrowing” of the difference in educational achievement of white and Black students in the South.

But it was a “watershed moment,” according to a recent book published about the schools, “A Better Life for Their Children,” for another reason, too: Those who attended the schools would later actively participate in the Civil Rights Movement, overturning segregation as an official American policy. The list of notable alumni includes longtime U.S. Rep. John Lewis and Medgar Evers, a field secretary for the NAACP who was assassinated in 1963.

Today, most of those schools have dissolved into history, and only around 500 still exist, in varying states of upkeep.

Andrew Feiler, a Georgia-born photographer, visited and photographed 105 of the extant schools and spoke with those connected to the schools and their legacy to publish “A Better Life for Their Children.” His book, released in 2021, is currently the basis of a traveling exhibition.

These days, race and educational opportunity still seem troublingly linked. NAEP data shows a consistent, three-decade-long gap in student performance in categories like 12th grade math and reading for Black students when compared to white ones. These gaps are often blamed on racial and economic segregation.

Perhaps that’s why some observers have connected Feiler’s exhibition about the past to the racial-educational gap of today, particularly noting the contemporary lack of adequate resources for public schools and the “school-to-prison pipeline.”

So EdSurge pulled Feiler aside to ask him what, if any, lesson he thinks the Rosenwald Schools might have for educators today.

This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

EdSurge: When and why did you decide to take on the project?

Andrew Feiler: I've been a serious photographer most of my life, and about a dozen years ago, I started down this path of taking my work more seriously and, mercifully, being taken more seriously, and I had to figure out what my voice was as a photographer.

I've been very involved in the civic life of my community — I've been very involved in the nonprofit world and the political world — and when I thought about my voice as a photographer, I found myself drawn to topics that were of interest in the course of my civic life.

And so I had done my first photography book, which came out in 2015 — just a portrait of an abandoned college campus. And it uses this emotional disconnect between these familiar education spaces, classrooms and hallways and locker rooms, but they have this veneer of abandonment…

That body of work ended up being about the importance of historically Black colleges and the importance of education as the on-ramp to the American middle class.

And I was thinking about what I was going to do next, and I found myself at lunch with an African American preservationist, and she was the first person to tell me about Rosenwald Schools. And the story shocked me.

I'm a fifth-generation, Jewish Georgian. I've been a civic activist my entire life. The pillars of the Rosenwald Schools’ story — Southern, education, civic, progressive — these are the pillars of my life. How could I have never heard of Rosenwald Schools?

And so I came home and I Googled it, and I found that while there were a number of more academic books on the subject, there was not a comprehensive photographic account of the program, and so I set out to do exactly that. Over the next three and a half years, I drove 25,000 miles across all 15 of the program states. Of the original 4,978 schools, only about 500 survive. Only half of those have been restored, about 105 schools, and the result is this book and this traveling exhibition.

Can I introduce the characters?

Sure. Introduce away.

At the heart of the story are two men.

Julius Rosenwald was born to Jewish immigrants who had fled religious persecution in Germany. He grows up in Springfield, Illinois, across the street from Abraham Lincoln's home. And he rises to become president of Sears, Roebuck & Company, and with innovations like “satisfaction guaranteed or your money back,” he turns Sears into the world's largest retailer in its era, and he becomes one of the earliest and greatest philanthropists in American history.

And his cause is what only later becomes known as “civil rights.”

Booker T. Washington was born into slavery in Virginia, attends Hampton College and becomes an educator. He is the founder of the historically Black college Tuskegee Institute, originally in Alabama.

These two men met in 1911.

And you have to remember, 1911 was before the Great Migration [the period between the 1910s and the 1970s when millions of Black people poured out of the South and moved to the North, Midwest and West fleeing racial violence and seeking opportunity].

Ninety percent of African Americans live in the South. And public schools for African Americans are mostly shacks, with a fraction of the funding that was afforded public schools for white children.

And that is the need, that's the environment that they find. And these two men like each other, form partnerships, work together, and in 1912 they create this program that becomes known as “Rosenwald Schools.” And over the next 25 years, from 1912 to 1937, they built 4,978 schools across 15 Southern and border states, and the results are transformative.

Having visited so many of the remaining schools, what impression did they leave on you?

... These places, are the locus of history and memory in a community, [and when] we lose places and spaces like this, we lose a piece of the American soul.

Well, the structures have an austere beauty. Their architecture is very vernacular and very local to the region in which they arise. Whether they are restored — or even having a veneer of abandonment — I find them beautiful.

But I think there's another important component.

I knew this was an extraordinary story. It was not clear to me from the beginning, how do you tell it visually? And I started out shooting exteriors of these buildings: One-teacher schools, two-teacher schools, three-teacher schools. These small structures. By the end of the program, they're building one-, two- and three-story red brick buildings.

There's an interesting architectural narrative, but when I found out that only 10 percent of the schools survive — only half of those have been restored — I realized that the historic preservation imperative is a huge, important part of the story, because these spaces, these places, are the locus of history and memory in a community, [and when] we lose places and spaces like this, we lose a piece of the American soul.

And once I realized that the preservation narrative was important, then I had to get inside, and suddenly I needed permission. And that's when I meet all of these extraordinary people — former students, former teachers, preservationists, civic leaders — and I bring their connections to this broader Rosenwald School story into this narrative with portraits.

How much of your project’s timing relies on a recently intensified desire to place greater emphasis on preserving Black history? How much of that explains why it’s resonating now?

Let me say a couple things about Rosenwald Schools as a program. First of all, the Rosenwald Schools are one of the most transformative developments in the first half of the 20th century in America. They dramatically reshaped the African American experience, and that dramatically reshapes the American experience.

There are two economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago who have done five studies of Rosenwald Schools, and what their data shows is that prior to Rosenwald Schools, there was a large and persistent Black-white education gap in the South. That gap closes precipitously between World War I and World War II, and the single greatest driver of that achievement is growth from all schools. In addition, many of the leaders and foot soldiers in the Civil Rights Movement come through these schools: Medgar Evers, Maya Angelou, multiple members of the Little Rock Nine who integrate Little Rock Central High, Congressman John Lewis who wrote this extraordinary introduction to my book, all went to Rosenwald Schools, and so the results of this program are transformative.

But to go back to the heart of your question, I think what resonates about this story today is that we live in a divided America, and we often feel that our problems are so intractable, especially those related to race.

Julius Rosenwald and Booker T. Washington, in 1912, in deeply segregated, deeply Jim Crow America, were reaching across divides, of race, of religion, of region, and they fundamentally transformed this country for the better. And I think the heart of this story speaks to everybody today, driving for social change in America. And individual actions still matter, and that individual actions change the world.

So if we take the sweep of your recent projects — I’m thinking of this one and the other book you mentioned, “Without Regard to Sex, Race, or Color,” which looked at Morris Brown College — has how you think about education changed in any tangible ways?

I have come out of this work with appreciation for the role that education has played throughout the sweep of American history.

The first taxpayer-funded school was created in America — done in Massachusetts in 1644; that is, 380 years ago. And there's a direct connection between that early commitment to education; the Land Grant College Act, which passed in 1862 and funds colleges all across America; HBCUs, predominantly created in the decades after the Civil War; Rosenwald Schools in the early decades of the 20th century; the educational provisions of the GI Bill, which transform America from relatively poor to relatively prosperous; [and] Brown v. Board of Education, one of the high watermarks of the Civil Rights Movement.

What are we talking about today? College affordability, banning books, circumscribing curriculum.

We have a 380-year tradition in which education has been the backbone of the American Dream, the on-ramp to the American middle class. And then today, that is a tradition at risk, and I think we need to understand and protect the importance of this tradition in our country.

Any parting lessons that educators can learn from this work?

I think what I said earlier is really in the spirit of what you're asking about, which is that the levels of division currently across our country are troubling. And I think it's important for us as Americans to reflect on our history and how we have come together to make America a better place. And the relationship between Julius Rosenwald and Booker T. Washington, this is one of the earliest collaborations between Blacks and Jews and a cause that only later becomes known as “civil rights.” Their collaboration, their work together, their friendship is a model for how we as individuals can make a difference in our culture. They are reaching across divides of race. They are reaching across divides of religion. They are reaching across divides into a greater region, all of which remain divides in our culture today.

They're reaching across those divides, and they're creating a transformative impact on the country. And I think this is a model for all of us to remember, that we are the change that we seek. We have the capacity to make a difference, and we need to follow in the footsteps of this story to reshape this country for all of us.

Een onderzoeksteam van de Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA) heeft een grondige studie uitgevoerd naar een recente controverse die de academische wereld en het publieke debat in Nederland beroerde. 

De kwestie begon in december 2022, toen UvA-docent Laurens Buijs een klokkenluidersrapport indiende. Hierin beweerde hij dat ‘woke cultuur’ en diversiteitsinitiatieven de academische vrijheid, onderwijseffectiviteit en onderzoekskwaliteit negatief beïnvloedden. Buijs beschreef dit als een ‘zorgwekkende radicalisering’. Hij bekritiseerde specifiek niet-binaire genderidentiteiten en het gebruik van genderneutrale voornaamwoorden, wat volgens hem een ‘lege hype’ zonder solide wetenschappelijke basis is. 

Anti-genderretoriek van Buijs

Deze zaak is een voorbeeld van ‘anti-gendermobilisatie’ – een georganiseerd verzet tegen gendergelijkheid, LGBTIQ+-rechten en aanverwante academische velden zoals genderstudies, stellen de onderzoekers. Ze herkenden verschillende kenmerken van anti-genderretoriek in de beweringen van Buijs en het daaropvolgende publieke debat. 

Het eerste punt betreft het versterken van traditionele binaire gendernormen en het verwerpen van het idee van gender als een spectrum. Daarnaast wordt anti-gendersentiment vaak gebruikt als politiek middel om steun te verkrijgen. Ten slotte zijn er pogingen om genderstudies als academische discipline in diskrediet te brengen, concluderen ze. 

Baudet en Wilders steunden Buijs 

De zaak kreeg al snel een politieke lading. Rechtse politieke partijen in Nederland, met name de PVV van Geert Wilders en het FvD van Thierry Baudet, omarmden Buijs’ klachten en hesen hem op het schild als voorvechter van het vrije woord. Zo nodigde de huidige Kamervoorzitter Martin Bosma, die toen nog PVV-Kamerlid was, Laurens Buijs uit in de Tweede Kamer. 

De wekelijkse nieuwsbrief is nog korte tijd gratis te ontvangen. De voorwaarden vindt u hier.

De PVV en FvD gebruikten de situatie om te betogen dat sociale wetenschappen, inclusief genderstudies, een bedreiging vormen voor de samenleving, schrijven de onderzoekers. In hun verkiezingsprogramma’s voor november 2023 verwees de PVV naar ‘gendergekte’ en FvD naar ‘woke propaganda’ als kwesties die aanpak behoeven. 

Deze politieke steun past in een breder Europees patroon, waarbij populistische partijen steeds vaker anti-gendergevoelens in hun programma’s opnemen, benadrukken de onderzoekers. 

Neoliberalisering van de universiteit 

Een cruciaal aspect van de analyse betreft de onbedoelde bijdrage van de neoliberalisering van het onderwijs aan de situatie. De onderzoekers stellen dat dit neoliberalisme de verhoudingen rond kennisproductie heeft veranderd: studenten worden steeds meer gezien als ‘klanten’, de universiteit als een ‘bedrijf’, en onderwijs als een ‘product’. 

Academische vrijheid wordt daarmee vooral individualistisch begrepen, stellen ze. Sommige studenten interpreteren concepten zoals ‘gesitueerde kennis’ als rechtvaardiging voor het idee dat elke mening, inclusief potentieel haatzaaiende uitspraken, beschermd zou moeten worden onder de vlag van academische vrijheid – dus ook de meningen van Buijs. 

De Amsterdamse wetenschappers stellen dat deze individualistische benadering de collectieve aard van kennisproductie ondermijnt. In plaats van een gezamenlijk streven naar waarheid, wordt academische vrijheid zo gereduceerd tot een uitwisseling van individuele meningen. 

Reactie van de universiteit en zwijgplicht 

De UvA reageerde door het personeel te verzoeken zich te onthouden van deelname aan publieke of interne debatten over de kwestie. Dit creëerde wat de onderzoekers een ‘getuigenisvacuüm’ noemen – een situatie waarin belangrijke informatie wordt achtergehouden. 

Deze opgelegde stilte was vanuit juridisch- en managementperspectief begrijpelijk, maar had ook negatieve gevolgen. Het ontzegde studenten en medewerkers toegang tot belangrijke context en alternatieve perspectieven. Dit was vooral problematisch voor gemarginaliseerde studenten, die zich onzekerder gingen voelen, schrijven de auteurs. 

Bedreiging voor genderstudies 

De controverse onderstreepte daarnaast een bredere bedreiging voor genderstudies. Anti-gendercampagnes schilderen het veld vaak af als een bron van maatschappelijk verval, en er worden pogingen gedaan om de academische legitimiteit van het veld in diskrediet te brengen. 

De auteurs schrijven dat ze herhaaldelijk anti-genderbeweringen moesten weerleggen. Collega’s uit andere vakgebieden stelden vaak vragen die de geloofwaardigheid van genderstudies in twijfel trokken. Deze aanvallen op de legitimiteit van een onderzoeksveld bedreigen niet alleen de academische vrijheid, maar ook de veiligheid en het welzijn van niet-binaire en transgender studenten en medewerkers, aldus de onderzoekers. 

Bevorderen van solidariteit 

Het is belangrijk om collectieve opvattingen over academische vrijheid te hebben en ruimte voor kritisch genderonderzoek te houden, concluderen de onderzoekers. Ze benadrukken de vitale rol van feministische onderwijsmethoden bij het bevorderen van solidariteit en het creëren van ondersteunende ruimtes voor gemarginaliseerde studenten. 

Universiteiten moeten daarnaast meer aandacht besteden aan manieren waarop neoliberale benaderingen van onderwijs de voorwaarden kunnen scheppen voor anti-genderretoriek. Instellingen worden aangemoedigd om zorgvuldiger om te gaan met controverses rond genderkwesties. In plaats van alleen te vertrouwen op juridische procedures en opgelegde stilte, suggereren de onderzoekers dat het belangrijk is om ruimte te creëren voor open dialoog en het delen van verschillende perspectieven. 

Tot slot benadrukken de onderzoekers het belang van het ondersteunen en legitimeren van genderstudies en aanverwante vakgebieden. Universiteiten worden opgeroepen om de waarde van deze disciplines te verdedigen en ervoor te zorgen dat ze de nodige middelen en institutionele steun krijgen om te blijven floreren. 

The post “Zaak Laurens Buijs is toonbeeld van anti-gendermobilisatie aan de universiteit” first appeared on ScienceGuide.

Het bericht “Zaak Laurens Buijs is toonbeeld van anti-gendermobilisatie aan de universiteit” verscheen eerst op ScienceGuide.

Het kabinet gaat inderdaad hard bezuinigen op het hoger onderwijs en de wetenschap, blijkt uit het regeeraprogramma van kabinet Schoof dat vandaag is gepresenteerd. “We maken scherpe keuzes om de overheidsfinanciën gezond te kunnen houden. Ook op onderwijs en onderzoek wordt bezuinigd. Met de sector zorgen wij ervoor dat dit zorgvuldig gebeurt”, schrijft het kabinet.

Concreet wordt bezuinigd op onder meer de starters- en stimuleringsbeurzen, internationale studenten, en vanaf 2030 ook op de financiering van de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). Verder komt er, door het schrappen van het Fonds voor Onderzoek en Wetenschap, minder investeringen in grootschalige wetenschappelijke infrastructuur.

Universiteiten moeten zich meer gaan profileren en meer samenwerken, zowel nationaal als internationaal, vindt het kabinet. Op de sectorplannen, die daartoe nuttige instrumenten worden geacht, wordt dan ook niet bezuinigd. In plaats daarvan zijn de starters- en stimuleringsbeurzen de klos.

De kwaliteitsmiddelen worden per 1 januari 2025 toegevoegd aan de vaste voet van het hbo en wo, wat moet zorgen voor “meer rust in de financiering”. Dit was reeds een maatregel van het vorige kabinet. Daarnaast gaat dit kabinet werk maken van capaciteitsbekostiging.

WIB komt eraan, maar uitzonderingen blijven mogelijk

De Wet Internationalisering in Balans, door voormalig minister Robbert Dijkgraaf opgetuigd om het Nederlands als wetenschapstaal te versterken en buitenlandse studenten te weren, wordt doorgezet. Vrijwel alle opleidingen in het hoger onderwijs zullen voor maximaal een derde uit Engelstalige onderdelen mogen bestaan. Uitzonderingen worden gemaakt voor opleidingen in bepaalde tekortsectoren, “zoals bèta en techniek, en met oog voor regionale omstandigheden.:

De wekelijkse nieuwsbrief is nog korte tijd gratis te ontvangen. De voorwaarden vindt u hier.

Universiteiten en hogescholen krijgen daarnaast meer mogelijkheden om te sturen op studentenstromen, onder andere door een numerus fixus op trajectniveau. Ook wordt een noodfixus voor niet-EER studenten mogelijk. Zij hebben niet dezelfde rechten als studenten van binnen de EER, en kunnen dus makkelijker geweigerd worden. Met het terugdringen van het aantal buitenlandse studenten mikt het kabinet op een besparing tot 293 miljoen euro structureel.

“Naast wettelijke maatregelen zetten we in op aanpalend beleid, bijvoorbeeld op het gebied van
beurzenprogramma’s en studiefinanciering, en op de Europese samenwerking die nodig is om daarop
gerichter te sturen”, voegt het kabinet nog toe.

Belang van leven lang ontwikkelen

Ondanks de bezuinigingen benadrukt de regering het belang van ‘leven lang ontwikkelen’ (LLO). Dit wordt gezien als cruciaal om mensen weerbaar en wendbaar te maken voor de arbeidsmarkt. Het kabinet zet de uitvoering van de LLO-onderwijsagenda voort, wat moet bijdragen aan de continue ontwikkeling van werkenden in een tijd van grote maatschappelijke opgaven en een veranderende arbeidsmarkt.

Daar ligt een forse opdracht: uit recent OESO-onderzoek bleek dat de kosten van onderwijs voor 53 procent van de Nederlandse volwassenen een probleem zijn. Dat is het hoogste percentage binnen de OESO.

Kabinet zet langstudeerboete door

Ook in het hbo zal het bloed warm zijn. Het verenigde verzet van hogescholen tegen de langstudeerboete heeft niets uitgehaald, blijkt uit het regeerprogramma. Daar zegt het kabinet in overleg met onderwijsinstellingen en studenten te werken aan deze “langstudeermaatregel”. Hogescholen, die sowieso al te maken hebben met krimpende studentenaantallen, vrezen door de langstudeerboete nog meer studenten mis te lopen.

Het vooruitzicht dat het kabinet de ‘opwaartse druk’ uit het vervolgonderwijs wil halen en jongeren wil stimuleren om naar het hbo te gaan, zal beter worden ontvangen bij hogescholen. Daarnaast zal het kabinet met geld komen om belangrijke opleidingen in krimpgebieden te kunnen behouden.

Het BSA wordt niet versoepeld

Voor studenten bevat het regeerprogramma veel zure druiven. Naast de invoering van de langstudeerboete zal het bindend studieadvies juist niet worden afgeschaft of versoepeld, en blijft selectie aan de poort “onverminderd mogelijk”.

Vanaf 2027 komt er wel 1,4 miljard beschikbaar voor een extra tegemoetkoming aan studenten die onder het leenstelsel studeerden. Dit bedrag komt bovenop de eenmalige tegemoetkomingen die al eerder waren aangekondigd. Daarnaast krijgen hoger-onderwijsinstellingen een zorgplicht van sociale veiligheid.

Handschoenen af

Hoewel het nog wachten is op de financiële paragraaf die bij deze kabinetsplannen hoort, lijken de reeds aangekondigde bezuinigen werkelijk te worden, en zullen de handschoenen afgaan. Actiegroep WOinActie beloofde bij aanvang van het academisch jaar al de “meest disruptieve staking aller tijden” te organiseren als deze bezuinigingen doorgang vinden.

Naar verluidt overlegt de groep na Prinsjesdag met de vakbonden over de precieze invulling van de aangekondigde staking. In de Landelijke Studenten Vakbond (LSVb) zullen ze een bondgenoot vinden. “De jonge generaties van ons land worden door dit kabinet kapot bezuinigd. Dus er zit nog maar één ding op: keihard actievoeren!”, aldus LSVb-voorzitter Abdelkader Karbache.

The post Nieuw kabinet gaat hard “maar behoedzaam” bezuinigingen op hoger onderwijs en wetenschap first appeared on ScienceGuide.

Het bericht Nieuw kabinet gaat hard “maar behoedzaam” bezuinigingen op hoger onderwijs en wetenschap verscheen eerst op ScienceGuide.

Here’s a cool tool you can use to help you find inspiration and enjoyment: The Schoolyard Podcast is a new show from School Specialty and teacher Nancy Chung. Twice each month, host Chung, also known as @FancyNancyin5th on Instagram and TikTok, will be joined by industry experts, fellow educators, and subject matter experts from School Specialty to dive into educational trends, seasonally relevant topics, and emerging and proven solutions to create an entertaining and educational listening experience.

Chung is a fun-loving 5th-grade teacher, former robotics coach, and content creator from Orange County, California, in her 26th year of teaching. She is passionate about sharing her ideas on creative projects, designing intentional learning spaces, teaching highly engaging lessons, building meaningful relationships, and cultivating a community that sparks discovery and inclusion.

Each episode will begin with a thought-provoking introduction by Chung, followed by a conversation between Chung and the episode’s guest. In the final segment, launching in episode 5 and dubbed “Tag, You’re It!,” Chung and the featured guest will answer a question submitted by a listener by tagging @SchoolSpecialty with #schoolyardtagyoureit and their question on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, or Twitter. Listeners who have their question answered on the air will receive a free Schoolyard Podcast t-shirt. 

The first five episodes explore:

1. “How to Make Space for Wellness and Social-emotional Learning” with Sue Ann Highland, PhD, national education strategist with School Specialty;
2. “Esports is Like a Magnet!” with Claire LaBeaux from the Network of Academic and Scholastic Esports Federations (NASEF);
3. “Extended Learning for Every Student” with Nicole Hill, a former educator, principal, and current subject matter expert with School Specialty;
4. “Setting the tone for Back to School” with Instagram influencers Stephanie Osmundson and Loreal Hemenway, collectively known as @happilyeverelementary; and
5. “Surprising Benefits of Robotics in Schools & Where to Start” with Naomi Hartl, science and STEM subject matter expert with School Specialty.

The first five episodes are available now on Apple Music, Spotify, Amazon Music, Samsung Podcasts, Podcast Index, and Listen Notes. Learn more.

The post The Schoolyard Podcast from School Specialty and Nancy Chung appeared first on EdTech Digest.

One of the country’s richest nonprofits focused on online education has been giving out grants for more than a year. But so far, the group, known as Axim Collaborative, has done so slowly — and pretty quietly.

“There has been little buzz about them in digital learning circles,” says Russ Poulin, executive director of WCET, a nonprofit focused on digital learning in higher education. “They are not absent from the conversation, but their name is not raised very often.”

Late last month, an article in the online course review site Class Central put it more starkly, calling the promise of the nonprofit “hollow.” The op-ed, by longtime online education watcher Dhawal Shah, noted that according to the group’s most recent tax return, Axim is sitting on $735 million and had expenses of just $9 million in tax year 2023, with $15 million in revenue from investment income. “Instead of being an innovator, Axim Collaborative seems to be a non-entity in the edtech space, its promises of innovation and equity advancement largely unfulfilled,” Shah wrote.

The group was formed with the money made when Harvard University and MIT sold their edX online platform to for-profit company 2U in 2021 for about $800 million. At the time many online learning leaders criticized the move, since edX had long touted its nonprofit status as differentiating it from competitors like Coursera. The purchase did not end up working out as planned for 2U, which this summer filed for bankruptcy.

So what is Axim investing in? And what are its future plans?

EdSurge reached out to Axim’s CEO, Stephanie Khurana, to get an update.

Not surprisingly, she pushed back on the idea that the group is not doing much.

“We’ve launched 18 partnerships over the past year,” she says, noting that many grants Axim has awarded were issued since its most recent tax return was filed. “It’s a start, and it’s seeding a lot of innovations. And that to me is very powerful.”

One of the projects she says she is most proud of is Axim’s work with HBCUv, a collaboration by several historically Black colleges to create a shared technology platform and framework to share online courses across their campuses. While money was part of that, Khurana says she is also proud of the work her group did helping set up a course-sharing framework. Axim also plans to help with “incorporating student success metrics in the platform itself,” she says, “so people can see where they might be able to support students with different kinds of advising and different kinds of student supports.”

The example embodies the group’s philosophy of trying to provide expertise and convening power, rather than just cash, to help promising ideas scale to support underserved learners in higher education.

Listening Tour

When EdSurge talked with Khurana last year, she stressed that her first step would be to listen and learn across the online learning community to see where the group could best make a difference.

One thing that struck her as she did that, she says, is “hearing what barriers students are facing, and what's keeping them from persisting through their programs and finding jobs that match with their skills and being able to actually realize better outcomes.”

Grant amounts the group has given out so far range from around $500,000 for what she called “demonstration projects” to as much as $3 million.

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a key focus of Axim’s work, though Khurana says the group is treading gingerly.

“We are looking very carefully at how and where AI is beneficial, and where it might be problematic, especially for these underserved learners,” she says. “And so trying to be clear-eyed about what those possibilities are, and then bring to bear the most promising opportunities for the students and institutions that we're supporting.”

One specific AI project the group has supported is a collaboration between Axim, Campus Evolve, University of Central Florida and Indiana Tech to explore research-based approaches to using AI to improve student advising. “They're developing an AI tool to have a student-facing approach to understanding, ‘What are my academic resources? What are career-based resources?,’” she says. “A lot of times those are hard to discern.”

Another key work of Axim involves keeping up an old system rather than starting new ones. The Axim Collaborative manages the Open edX platform, the open-source system that hosts edX courses and can also be used by any institution with the tech know-how and the computer servers to run it. The platform is used by thousands of colleges and organizations around the world, including a growing number of governments, who use it to offer online courses.

Anant Agarwal, who helped found edX and now works at 2U to coordinate its use, is also on a technical committee for Open edX.

He says the structure of supporting Open edX through Axim is modeled on the way the Linux open-source operating system is managed.

While edX continues to rely on the platform, the software is community-run. “There has to be somebody that maintains the repositories, maintains the release schedule and provides funding for certain projects,” Agarwal says. And that group is now Axim.

When the war in Ukraine broke out, Agarwal says, the country “turned on a dime and the universities and schools started offering courses on Open edX.”

Poulin, of WCET, says that it’s too early to say whether Axim’s model is working.

“While their profile and impact may not be great to this point, I am willing to give startups some runway time to determine if they will take off,” he says, noting that “Axim is, essentially, still a startup.”

His advice: “A creative, philanthropic organization should take some risks if they are working in the ‘innovation’ sphere. We learn as much from failures as successes.”

For Khurana, Axim’s CEO, the goal is not to find a magic answer to deep-seated problems facing higher education.

“I know some people want something that will be a silver bullet,” she says. “And I think it's just hard to come by in a space where there's a lot of different ways to solve problems. Starting with people on the ground who are doing the work — [with] humility — is probably one of the best ways to seed innovations and to start.”

Tijdens een Kamerdebat over de aankomende informele bijeenkomst van Europese onderwijs- en onderzoeksministers diende VVD-Kamerlid Martens-America een motie die zich uitspreekt tegen de Europese graad. Deze graad dient als een verdere vervolmaking van de Bologna-afspraken en moet studentmobiliteit binnen de Europese Unie verder aanjagen, diploma-erkenning tussen landen vereenvoudigen en Leven Lang Leren faciliteren.  

De druk van internationalisering 

De VVD vreest dat de invoering van deze graad de problemen met de hoge instroom van internationale studenten zal verergeren. “Mijn fractie maakt zich al enige tijd zorgen over de druk van internationalisering in het onderwijs op de leefomgeving en op de onderwijskwaliteit”, stelde Martens-America.  

De invoering van een Europese graad zou zorgen voor verdere internationalisering, terwijl het kabinet juist streeft naar een evenwichtigere balans binnen de Europese mobiliteit, betoogde ze. Middels een motie riep ze de minister daarom op zich ten aanzien van zijn Europese collega’s uit te spreken tegen een dergelijke Europese graad.  

Er ligt geen concreet voorstel 

Minister Bruins erkende de gevoeligheden rond het onderwerp. “Ik ben evenals mevrouw Martens-America kritisch op de door de Europese Commissie gepresenteerde visie op een gemeenschappelijke Europese graad. Ik begrijp ook wel haar zorgen”, zei de minister. Hij benadrukte echter dat er op dit moment nog geen concreet voorstel ligt, hoewel reeds gesprekken plaatsvinden over de mogelijke invulling van zo’n graad. 

De minister pleitte ervoor om betrokken te blijven bij deze gesprekken. “Ik vind het wel belangrijk om aan tafel te blijven zitten, zodat we mee kunnen blijven praten.” Hij zag zelfs potentiële voordelen in een goed uitgewerkt systeem. “Als dat concept waaraan nu wordt gewerkt, kan leiden tot een beter evenwicht in studentmobiliteit in Europa, dus beide kanten op, dus ook voor Nederlandse studenten die naar het buitenland gaan, dan zou zo’n graad voor Nederland wellicht ook positief kunnen zijn.” 

Daar ga ik niet in mee 

Tegelijkertijd stelt Bruins een duidelijke grens, zo liet hij aan Martens-America weten. “Als een Europese graad zou betekenen dat een deel van ons Nederlandse systeem wordt vervangen, of dat de Nederlandse graden zouden worden vervangen door een Europese graad, dan sta ik meteen aan haar zijde; daar ga ik niet in mee.” 

Het VVD-Kamerlid toonde begrip voor de positie van de minister, maar bleef bezorgd over de mogelijkheid dat de Tweede Kamer voor een voldongen feit zou komen te staan. “Op het moment dat er in Europa een deal ligt, ligt er een deal, en dan kunnen wij daar niks meer aan doen”, waarschuwde ze. 

Waar de visie zou kunnen eindigen 

Als compromis stelde de minister voor om na de informele raad een brief aan de Kamer te sturen. “Dan stuur ik na die raad een brief aan de Kamer om een nadere appreciatie te geven van de ontwikkeling die gaande is, waar die visie die nu wordt neergelegd, zou kunnen eindigen, en wat het kabinet daarvan vindt”, beloofde Bruins. 

Deze toezegging was voor Martens-America voldoende om haar motie aan te houden. Al eerder bleek dat NSC zeer kritisch is op de Europese Graad en een waslijst aan bezwaren heeft. NSC vreest, net als de VVD, dat de Europese graad een aanzuigende werking heeft. Bovendien kan zo’n graad de kwaliteit en imago van het Nederlandse hoger onderwijs schaden, denkt NSC.  

The post VVD wil geen Europese graad uit vrees voor toename internationalisering  first appeared on ScienceGuide.

Het bericht VVD wil geen Europese graad uit vrees voor toename internationalisering  verscheen eerst op ScienceGuide.

In close with a dedicated force in our field who believes in the power of education to shape lives. 

INTERVIEW | by Victor Rivero

As CEO of Savvas Learning Company, Bethlam Forsa leads up a global next-generation K-12 learning solutions provider that recently acquired Outlier, an edtech startup that has created a portfolio of high-quality online college-level courses enabling high school students to earn dual credit while never having to leave their school building. A leader whose career in education and publishing spans over two decades, Bethlam has guided Savvas to deliver award-winning product lines. The Savvas Realize digital platform won the 2024 EdTech Digest Cool Tool Award for Learning Management System Solution. The company’s enVision Mathematics and SuccessMaker: Foundations of High School Math were named EdTech Cool Tool Award finalists in the Math Solution and the Personalized Learning Solution categories, respectively. Bethlam was also recently named the Most Influential Thought Leader in EdTech by the 2024 CODiE Awards. In this EdTech Digest exclusive, hear why she first became drawn to the work of education, how she defines an oft-used phrase, and her thoughts on technology’s role in—and what the future of—learning might look like.  

What prompted you to first become involved with technology and learning?

I was drawn to this work because I fundamentally believe in the power of education to shape lives. The best way to make a difference in the world is through a quality education. To do this, all of us at Savvas have dedicated ourselves to supporting educators by developing innovative, high-quality learning solutions that enable all students to succeed. Early in my career, I realized that education technology, when leveraged effectively, could revolutionize the way students learn, just as it has empowered us in our everyday lives. We’ve long been a leader in the digital transformation of K-12 education, including our pioneering use of adaptive technology to provide personalized learning solutions that help educators meet the needs of all learners. Our learning management system, Savvas Realize, — it’s earned more than a dozen edtech innovation awards, including one from EdTech Digest — has been widely recognized as a game-changing platform known for driving innovation and exemplifying the best in edtech solutions. It’s an exciting time to be in the edtech industry. Technology will continue to significantly impact education, especially with the advent of generative AI and the possibility of it taking personalized learning to new heights.

‘It’s an exciting time to be in the edtech industry. Technology will continue to significantly impact education, especially with the advent of generative AI and the possibility of it taking personalized learning to new heights.’

How do you define “next-generation learning,” and why?

There is a simple truth in education that student engagement leads to student achievement. For us, next-generation learning is about combining the power of advanced technology with research-based pedagogy and compelling content to deliver interactive, real-world learning experiences that spark student engagement and drive student achievement. Another important aspect of next-generation learning is enabling differentiated instruction to meet the needs, skills, and interests of individual learners, making education personalized, relevant and engaging to each student. We know that the traditional, one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t work for all learners. That is why at Savvas we make it our mission to design flexible learning solutions that enable teachers to tailor instruction to each student’s distinct learning style and pace, ensuring that they receive personalized support and challenges that align with their abilities and goals. The educators and students who use our learning solutions deserve nothing less.

What does “proven pedagogy” mean to you and the team behind Savvas?

We take great pride in developing the highest-quality instructional materials available in today’s educational marketplace. Proven pedagogy is the very foundation of this. What it means to me, and all of us at Savvas, is that we develop research-based, standards-aligned learning solutions that incorporate the most current educational best practices coupled with compelling, relevant, and accurate content — all developed by dedicated teams of authors who are experts in their fields, working in conjunction with top editors, academic consultants, and teacher reviewers. In order to create our high-quality, evidence-based curriculum, we adhere to strict editorial standards and a rigorous product development process.

‘In order to create our high-quality, evidence-based curriculum, we adhere to strict editorial standards and a rigorous product development process.’

In the end, the gold standard for us is ensuring that the educational solutions we provide our customers prove to be efficacious and improve the educational outcomes and opportunities for all learners. As such, we believe that rigorous research should include multiple studies, creating a large body of research supporting an educational solution. For us, this involves continuously conducting research to measure the effectiveness of a product, as well as gain insights into educators’ experiences in the classroom. We partner with educators and school districts nationwide to constantly evaluate and test our instructional materials and drive development of evidence-based learning solutions. Our extensive research, combined with the feedback we receive from educators and teachers who use our programs, helps inform every step of our product development process, from pedagogy and instructional design to usability and efficacy in the classroom. Our goal is to ensure we deliver the most effective learning solutions that make a positive impact so that every student — no matter where they come from or which school they are in — has an opportunity to achieve their full potential.

What are some important guiding elements involved in helping students become productive contributing adults?

I believe it is important that we impart in young students the skills to help them thrive not just in the classroom but in life. Critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, teamwork, and other soft skills are essential for preparing students to navigate the complexities of adulthood. Likewise, encouraging curiosity and a love for lifelong learning can equip students with the mindset they’ll need to continuously adapt and grow.

As a next-generation K-12 education leader, Savvas develops instructional materials that make learning relevant to students’ lives and prepare them for college and career. Our programs challenge students to think more deeply and analytically about what they’ve read, giving them the tools to become critical thinkers and effective communicators, which is especially important in today’s fast-paced digital world. I think it’s important to also provide educators solutions that build upon the strong foundation of knowledge and life skills that they’ve taught their students by delivering personalized pathways to support college and career readiness for their high schoolers. Giving students the ability to “try on” college and earn valuable credit through dual-enrollment courses or take career technical education (CTE) classes to launch their careers is a critical next step to helping high school students become productive adults.

‘Giving students the ability to “try on” college and earn valuable credit through dual-enrollment courses or take career technical education (CTE) classes to launch their careers is a critical next step to helping high school students become productive adults.’

What trends are you looking at (AI, others) with the ‘future of learning’ in mind? And what does that look like to you—what do you see in the next couple of years for Savvas, for learning generally?

We are actively developing ways to use generative AI to create time-saving tools for teachers to reduce their burdensome administrative tasks, such as grading assignments and lesson planning. This will help make their jobs easier and alleviate some of the causes that have led to teacher burnout, allowing them to do what they love most: instructing students.

We are also leveraging AI to generate even more robust data-driven insights to differentiate instruction and enhance the adaptivity of our learning solutions. Another major focus of ours is using AI-powered tools to develop highly sophisticated and, most importantly, reliable “tutorbots” or “coaches” that can provide real-time feedback to students to improve their writing and math skills. The idea is that we want students to get better at literacy and math, and with machine-learning capabilities we can now give them in-the-moment, constructive critiques of their work that can guide them to become stronger at writing and math.

These are just some of the ways we are incorporating AI into our learning solutions. The use of generative AI in K-12 education is going to grow rapidly as more use cases are identified. Looking ahead, I think generative AI offers the potential to provide a deeply personalized learning experience like we’ve never seen before. It will bring to market new solutions to solve real world problems for teachers and learners in ways that were not previously possible. However, like with any new technology, the use of AI’s capabilities as a classroom tool must be pedagogically sound and implemented responsibly, with clear guardrails for its use that prioritize safety, integrity, and efficacy, above all else. Lastly, we must ensure that we keep teachers and students at the center of whatever learning solutions we create. AI may help revolutionize learning but it will never replace the teacher.

Anything you care to add or emphasize concerning edtech, the future of learning, or anything else regarding tech’s role in learning?

Edtech will continue to have a significant role in the future of learning. There’s no doubt about that. However, what I think is really important to point out is that edtech is also now reimagining learning for the future.

‘Edtech will continue to have a significant role in the future of learning. There’s no doubt about that. However, what I think is really important to point out is that edtech is also now reimagining learning for the future.’

We all know it’s vitally important that we prepare today’s students with the skills they will need to be successful in college and the workforce. According to the U.S. Department of Education, 70 percent of jobs will soon require education or training beyond high school. Yet only two in 10 high school students believe they are career-ready, according to a 2021 survey by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

Dual-enrollment courses can help fill the gap in college and career readiness by allowing students to simultaneously earn course credit for both high school and college while also exploring career pathways and learning skills needed in the job market. However, logistical challenges in the way these courses have been traditionally offered have often posed barriers to students. For example, in many cases students have long needed to travel to a nearby college — if one even exists in their community — to take a college-level dual-enrollment course. 

By utilizing technology, we can eliminate those barriers. Through our acquisition of Outlier, we are now able to offer the millions of students we serve the opportunity to experience the rigor of college courses through high-quality, online dual enrollment courses. Credit for these courses come from the University of Pittsburgh, a top 50 school, and are highly transferable. Since Outlier’s cinematically produced courses are offered asynchronously, students can take them virtually — in the comfort of their own school, at a time that fits conveniently into their high school schedule. What’s really exciting about these state-of-the-art Outlier offerings is that students, no matter where they live, can experience college-level courses taught by professors from Harvard, MIT, NYU and other first-rate institutions without the hassle of leaving their building or missing other classes. There’s nothing else like it on the market that makes earning college credit while in high school so accessible for students, jump-starting learning for their future. Outlier technology is the future of learning, happening now.

—

Victor Rivero is the Editor-in-Chief of EdTech Digest. Write to: victor@edtechdigest.com

The post Defining ‘Next-Gen’, ‘Proven Pedagogy’ and ‘Future of Learning’    appeared first on EdTech Digest.

Sinds 2019 voert NWO een beleid waarbij universiteiten verplicht zijn een inbeddingsgarantie te bieden voor kandidaten die zich aanmelden voor het Vidi Talentprogramma. Dit beleid vereist dat een onderzoeker een tenure-track aanstelling of een vaste positie moet worden aangeboden als die de financiering ontvangt. Het beleid is ingevoerd om gelijke behandeling voor Vidi-laureaten te waarborgen en eerdere gevallen te corrigeren waarin universiteiten niet voldoende steun verleenden aan beursontvangers.

Hoewel ik de intentie achter de inbeddingsgarantie volledig ondersteun, heeft de uitvoering van dit beleid in de afgelopen vijf jaar geleid tot aanzienlijke uitdagingen voor wetenschappers met tijdelijke contracten. Ondanks de goede bedoelingen van NWO, is het duidelijk geworden dat universiteiten – volgens een ongeschreven conventie – vaak terughoudend zijn om inbeddingsgaranties te verstrekken aan onderzoekers met tijdelijke contracten. In plaats daarvan worden deze garanties over het algemeen gereserveerd voor de huidige vaste medewerkers.

Beperkte concurrentie voor Vidi-beurzen

Deze praktijk heeft de concurrentie om Vidi-beurzen effectief beperkt tot interne afdelingskandidaten die al een vaste positie binnen hun respectieve afdelingen hebben, in plaats van de Vidi-beurzen open te stellen voor de meest gekwalificeerde kandidaten binnen de bredere academische gemeenschap. Tijdens een workshop voor Vidi-beursaanvragers van de Universiteit Utrecht (in april 2023) verklaarde een instructeur bijvoorbeeld expliciet dat medewerkers zonder vaste contract niet in aanmerking kwamen voor Vidi-beurzen, omdat de Universiteit Utrecht geen inbeddingsgarantie voor hen zou afgeven. Deze houding lijkt gangbaar onder universiteiten in Nederland.

De wekelijkse nieuwsbrief is nog korte tijd gratis te ontvangen. De voorwaarden vindt u hier.

Een beoordeling van de VIDI-ronde van 2022, waarvoor de beurzen werden toegekend in 2023 (gegevens beschikbaar op de website van NWO), bevestigt dit probleem verder. Alle Vidi-ontvangers in het domein Sociale Wetenschappen en Geesteswetenschappen (SSH) waren al vaste medewerkers bij hun faculteit. Dit roept vragen op over de eerlijkheid en gelijkheid van het Vidi-beurzenproces, aangezien benadelend werkt voor hooggekwalificeerde wetenschappers met tijdelijke contracten. Hoewel er misschien in 2022 ook aanvragers waren met tijdelijke contracten, wat onzeker blijft, blijkt er een duidelijke vooringenomenheid uit het feit dat alle ontvangers wél vaste faculteitsleden waren.

Verschil tussen Veni- en Vidi-subsidies      

In mijn correspondentie met de NWO heb ik voorgesteld om flexibelere criteria of alternatieve vormen van institutionele steun in te voeren die niet noodzakelijk een tenure-track of vaste positie vereisen, maar toch het succes van het project en de integratie van de onderzoeker in de gastinstelling waarborgen. Deze benadering is succesvol toegepast in het geval van de Veni-beurs, waarbij een tenure-track of vaste positie niet in de inbeddingsgarantie is opgenomen.

Als gevolg hiervan hebben universiteiten een grotere bereidheid getoond om garanties af te geven voor Veni-projecten, waardoor wetenschappers die nog geen vaste positie hebben verworven hun onderzoek kunnen voortzetten en een betekenisvolle bijdrage kunnen leveren aan de academische gemeenschap. NWO reageerde echter door het onderscheid tussen het Veni- en Vidi-programma te benadrukken, waarbij werd opgemerkt dat de eerste bedoeld is voor junior-onderzoekers en de laatste voor senior wetenschappers, zonder in te gaan op de kern van mijn zorg.

Daarnaast heb ik alternatieve oplossingen voorgesteld, zoals het gefaseerd implementeren van de inbeddingsvereiste. Dit zou universiteiten en onderzoeksinstellingen meer tijd geven om zich aan deze verwachtingen aan te passen, waardoor de onmiddellijke diskwalificatie van verdienstelijke kandidaten wordt vermeden.

Inbeddingsgarantie Vidi-subsidies sluit groep onderzoekers uit

Het is essentieel een belangrijk punt te verduidelijken om misverstanden te voorkomen. De kern van het probleem gaat verder dan het al dan niet simpelweg prioriteren van bepaalde kandidaten boven anderen in een competitie- of evaluatieproces tussen faculteitsleden en degenen met tijdelijke contracten. Momenteel ontbreekt het binnen universiteiten aan een transparant proces om te beoordelen wie de meest geschikte kandidaten voor Vidi-beurzen zijn. 

Het primaire punt van zorg is dat de clausule voor vaste contracten binnen de inbeddingsgarantie onderzoekers met tijdelijke contracten effectief uitsluit van de overweging voor Vidi-aanvragen door universiteiten. Als gevolg daarvan zijn Vidi-beurzen voorbehouden aan degenen met vaste posities of faculteitsleden, in plaats van toegankelijk te zijn voor de meest veelbelovende kandidaten, ongeacht hun contractstatus. 

NWO moet verantwoordelijkheid nemen

Deze uitsluiting ondermijnt de doelstellingen van de Vidi-beurs, beperkt de diversiteit van de aanvragers en kan bestaande machtsdynamieken in stand houden. NWO moet haar verantwoordelijkheid in deze context erkennen; als sleutelspeler in het systeem van onderzoeksfinanciering bij universiteiten zijn beslissingen van NWO nauw verbonden met het bredere academische kader, wat de noodzaak van gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid met universiteiten benadrukt.

In het licht van deze bevindingen is er een dringende noodzaak om het huidige beleid te heroverwegen en aan te passen. Hoewel universiteiten verantwoordelijk zijn voor hun praktijken, moet NWO ook háár rol erkennen en proactieve maatregelen nemen om ervoor te zorgen dat het VIDI-beurzenproces eerlijk en inclusief is voor alle in aanmerking komende onderzoekers.

Mehrdad Alipour is onderzoeker op het gebied van islamitische studies. Zijn onderzoek richt zich voornamelijk op islamitisch recht, rechtstheorie, Sji’i studies en Perzische intellectuele tradities. In september 2022 startte zijn NWO Veni-project ‘Beyond Binaries: Intersex in Islamic Legal Tradition’.

The post ‘Geen vast contract, geen kans: verborgen ongelijkheid in NWO-beleid voor Vidi-subsidies’ first appeared on ScienceGuide.

Het bericht ‘Geen vast contract, geen kans: verborgen ongelijkheid in NWO-beleid voor Vidi-subsidies’ verscheen eerst op ScienceGuide.

This is a comprehensive Learning Management System (LMS) that enhances the educational experience. The digital platform connects educators, students, and parents to facilitate interactive and engaging learning. It provides an app and webpage user-friendly interface for educators to efficiently create, manage, and deliver educational content. Administrators can effortlessly set up classes and curriculums, add users, and assign content, whether it is custom or pre-existing. Students can access this content, complete assignments, and track their progress. Students and teachers can use a stylus on the app to write directly on the assignment. It also has a helpful writing feature to display work. Part of its real value is actually quite basic: it allows efficient communication between teachers, students, and parents.

EdQuill was developed by a team with Ushapriya Ravilla to address the evolving needs of modern education. EdQuill aims to improve the teaching and learning experience, reduce administrative burdens on educators, and foster greater parent involvement in students’ education. It is available to educational institutions, learning centers, tutors, and educators. Access EdQuill by signing up for a free trial or scheduling a demo with EdQuill’s expert representatives.

In two short years, EdQuill has helped over 100 educators impact more than 2,000 students nationwide. Using the platform led to a 40% decrease in printing costs and increased productivity in administrative tasks for 100% of teachers. For these reasons and more, EdQuill earned a Cool Tool Award (finalist) for “Best Classroom Management Solution” as part of The EdTech Awards 2024 from EdTech Digest. Learn more. 

The post EdQuill appeared first on EdTech Digest.

Instellingen en organisaties die een collectief abonnement willen afsluiten, kunnen hier meer informatie vinden. Met zeer weinig moeite kunnen zij al hun werknemers en studenten toegang geven tot de artikelen en het archief van ScienceGuide.

Lezers die niet bij een organisatie in of rond het hoger onderwijs werken, hebben vanaf 19 september de mogelijkheid een individueel abonnement af te sluiten. Informatie daarover volgt. 

Als abonnee draagt u bij aan de missie: iedereen rond het hoger onderwijs voorzien van het relevante nieuws, in volstrekte onafhankelijkheid – iets dat helaas steeds vaker onder druk staat in het hoger onderwijs.  

Blik op de toekomst

De redactie is zeer erkentelijk jegens de instellingen en organisaties die ScienceGuide de afgelopen decennia als partner-instellingen hebben gesteund. 

De stap die nu wordt gezet, is niet vrijblijvend. ScienceGuide wil en moet groeien: meer ruimte voor diepgravende interviews, achtergronden en analyses over het hoger onderwijs en onderzoeksbeleid in binnen- en buitenland. Bovendien kunnen auteurs die een podium zoeken dan nog intensiever worden begeleid. 

Heeft u vragen of opmerkingen naar aanleiding van dit bericht, dan kunt u hoofdredacteur Frans van Heest benaderen op fvanheest@scienceguide.nl.  

The post Mededeling van de redactie first appeared on ScienceGuide.

Het bericht Mededeling van de redactie verscheen eerst op ScienceGuide.

HOUSTON — On a Saturday morning in August 2023, a crowd gathered outside the Houston Independent School District administration building with protest signs in hand. The brutal, sticky heat of Texas summer already had people wiping sweat from their brows and handing out bottled water from ice-filled coolers.

Teachers, parents and politicians took turns at the microphone, united in their criticism of the controversial state takeover of Texas’ largest school district. One fear expressed was about how the mostly Black and Latino students at 28 schools would fare under a plan created by new Superintendent Mike Miles that would require school libraries to cease, in essence, functioning as libraries.

Instead, they would become “team centers,” where teachers would send disruptive students to work independently. The most high-achieving students would be funneled there, too, where they could do worksheets at their own pace and free up teachers to focus on everyone else.

Taylor Hill, a student at Wheatley High School, would experience the change firsthand. Her school is located in Houston’s Fifth Ward neighborhood and serves a student body that is nearly 100 percent classified as economically disadvantaged.

The Texas Education Agency awards letter grades to schools and districts based on test scores and other student performance metrics. When Wheatley High received a seventh “F” rating from the Texas Education Agency in 2019, it triggered the state takeover of the district. A Houston lawmaker championed the 2015 law that created the mandatory takeover process, something he saw as a way to hold the district accountable for continually low-performing schools.

At the protest, Hill stepped up to the podium and spoke into the microphone, talking over a crescendo of buzzing cicadas. The library at her school is a refuge, she said.

“I live in Fifth Ward. There's not a lot there, but what is there should not be turned into a detention center, especially when I am constantly there,” Hill told the crowd. “I read a lot, and I just feel like that is not what needs to happen.”

Unfortunately for Hill, the new state-appointed superintendent went through with his plan. A year later, the early consequences are becoming clear. School librarians have lost their jobs. Teachers have adopted a district-approved curriculum that some feel is rote and uninspiring. And children are receiving different educations depending on which part of the city they call home — a divide that maps onto Houston’s income and racial disparities.

Man With a Plan for ‘Differentiation’

Mike Miles was appointed superintendent in June 2023, brought in to lead the state takeover and improve academic performance in Houston.

In addition to districts, schools in Texas are individually given A through F grades based partially on standardized test scores. Miles quickly created big and controversial plans to improve scores. One strategy among his planned overhaul — called the New Education System, or NES — was to close libraries at 28 schools out of the district’s 274 total and turn them into “team centers.” It would accomplish two goals, he said: create a place to send “disruptive” students after removing them from class as well as an environment to send high-achieving students for enrichment.

School principals were also given the option to voluntarily adopt the new system, becoming what the district referred to as “NES-aligned.” After adding in those campuses, a total of 85 schools would start fall 2023 under the program.

The problem? Myriad parents and teachers alike hated the idea of closing down libraries and isolating students, especially considering these schools — and the entire school district — serves a student population that’s overwhelmingly Black and Latino.

The map below shows Houston schools that are part of the New Education System with each neighborhood color-coded based on median income. Click on the map to see more information about income in each neighborhood. Areas become more green as income increases and more blue as income decreases.

One was Melissa Yarborough, a teacher at Navarro Middle School in Houston’s East End, which is home to one of the city’s historically Latino neighborhoods. While not targeted as a failing school, her campus became “NES-aligned,” meaning her principal opted into the New Education System.

Her two children, however, were students at one of the targeted schools, Pugh Elementary in the city’s northeastern Denver Harbor neighborhood. Although, it wasn’t labeled as “failing” when Miles was appointed superintendent. It had an A rating from the state in 2022. Even by Houston ISD’s own calculations, the school is expected to earn a B rating when 2023 and 2024 school “report cards” are released. It was a tougher scoring formula released last year that makes earning high “grades” harder. A lawsuit by Texas school districts over the change has halted the release of 2023 ratings for now, and a second lawsuit is similarly blocking the state from releasing 2024 ratings.

As demonstrators hung back and talked after the protest, Yarborough said she was horrified by the way Miles described his plan to move disruptive students to the library-turned-team-center and tune into lessons via Zoom.

“He said, ‘Imagine. I'm walking in with 150 kids. All the children are working on their own little assignment or whatever, individually or in pairs,’” Yarborough recalled. “He said it to me like it's a beautiful thing.”

She said Miles sold the idea as “differentiation,” a principle that all teachers learn during their undergraduate training. In essence, it’s the idea that teachers should adjust their lessons to each student’s needs, whether they’re struggling or grasping a concept quickly.

Yarborough said Miles’ plan isn’t effective differentiation, though. Disruptive students will receive a worse education, if the results of pandemic-era Zoom classes are any indicator, she said. And doing worksheets in the library isn’t a reward for high-achievers, she added.

Duncan Klussmann agreed with Yarborough’s assessment. A former superintendent of nearby Spring Branch Independent School District, he is now a professor of educational leadership and policy studies at the University of Houston. Ultimately, Klussmann said, Miles’ model is designed to produce higher test scores. But Klussmann is more interested to know what the student experience is in these schools.

“Just because you have higher state test schools, do more students go off to higher ed?” he asked. “Are they successful when they go off to higher ed? Do more students get a technical certification? Do more students go into the military, you know? Do they have a better life after high school? We don't know. We won't know for four, six, 10 years what the effect is of NES schools on students.”

Officials from Houston ISD did not respond to interview or information requests from EdSurge.

Displaced Librarians

When Brandie Dowda was hired at Burrus Elementary, a campus home to mostly Black and Hispanic students, she was the first librarian employed by the school in a decade.

Her tenure wouldn’t last long.

During summer 2023 — the same one during which Houstonians like student Hill and parent Yarborough protested outside the district administration building — Dowda was on vacation when the principal at Burrus informed her that the librarian position was being eliminated. The campus was going to be part of the inaugural New Education System cohort of schools, and the library would be closed.

Dowda found another librarian position in the district at Almeda Elementary and said she was happy at her new school. The library had long been central to life at the campus, and Dowda said students were rarely seen without a book in hand.

But again, her tenure would be short-lived.

Dowda was leaving for work one morning in January 2024 and quickly scrolled through the news feed on her phone before heading out the door when she saw it — a news article announcing that 26 more schools would join the New Education System in the fall of 2024.

Dowda’s school was on the list. “I went, ‘Oh, I get to do this again,’” she recalled. “I found out from the regular news, which if I remember correctly, is also how my principal found out. It's kind of how everybody found out.”

Dowda said that her former library at Burrus wasn’t turned into a team center — a classroom was used instead — but students still weren’t allowed to access the books. Then, in May 2024 at Almeda, she was in the middle of a lesson when movers arrived to begin disassembling the library, she said. As the school year ended, the carpet was left with bald spots where shelves had been removed and the concrete floor underneath showed through. Her students were upset to learn that their library would be closed when they returned in the fall.

Dowda’s story mirrors that of Cheryl Hensley, the former librarian at Lockhart Elementary. Hensley had been retired from her 38-year career in Houston ISD when a friend coaxed her into applying for the librarian position at the campus, which is in the city’s historically Black neighborhood of Third Ward.

Like Dowda at Almeda Elementary, she was at Lockhart for one year before her job was eliminated. Her principal opted into the NES standards believing that, in doing so, decisions about the school would still ultimately be made at the campus level. Hensley found out she lost her job in summer 2023.

“The principal is a super supporter of libraries and books and literature and reading, all over, I mean 100 percent,” Hensley said, “and so she was thinking I would be OK. They told [the principal] they could keep everybody, that everything would be the same and nothing would change.”

But then Hensley heard from the principal: “She called me in and just said, ‘No, I can't keep you. They told me that I have to turn my library into a team center.’”

Beyond the professional upheaval, Hensley and Dowda worry about what the absence of a school library will mean for students’ success in elementary school and beyond. Third grade is widely noted as a critical time for children to achieve reading proficiency, otherwise putting them at risk of falling behind academically during each subsequent year.

“I teach them to love to read,” Hensley said. “If you're invested so much in reading and math, then you're missing a major component [by closing libraries]. Because if a kid loves to read, they will read more. If a kid loves to read, he will comprehend more. We are part of that solution.”

Hensley said she visited her former colleagues and students at Lockhart monthly during the 2023-24 school year, and students asked her if she was back to reopen the library each time. It has been turned into a team center with about 50 desks, she says, where students are sent if they finish their classwork early.

Hensley said the school’s library, even if it’s not operating as one, still has books thanks to the principal’s actions in 2023. A work crew arrived to remove the shelves — making way for the team center desks — when the principal was at an off-campus meeting, Hensley recalled. The principal returned just in time to tell the crew that nothing was to be taken.

“She said, ‘We'll work that out, because you're not taking the books,’” Hensley says. “She pushed back, and I appreciate her 100 percent because still the library itself at Lockhart is basically intact.”

Houston ISD told Houston Landing that some schools allow students to informally check out books on an “honor system.”

The NES approach might fix the problem of low test scores, she said, “but it's not going to give you a lifetime learner or lifetime reader that will read and comprehend and think for themselves.”

While the district is moving forward with bringing more schools in its New Education System — and closing more libraries in the process — Dowda said that there aren’t any parents or community members she’s heard from who see library closures as a smart move.

“Why are you closing the libraries when you want to improve literacy and reading scores? They have not yet explained to us how that makes sense,” Dowda said. “I'm not the only one who has pointed out that this is not happening in the schools in the west side of Houston, which are the affluent schools that are mostly white. It is happening in the Title I schools with high poverty rates that are populated mostly by African American and Hispanic students.”

Dowda won’t be looking for yet another librarian job within Houston ISD. Instead, she found one in a different school district nearby. She predicts other educators who work at NES schools will do the same.

“I'm going to go to another district that values libraries,” she said, “and where I can have stability in a library and go about my librarian business of helping children find books that they enjoy reading.”

‘It’s Segregation’

It was last November that Yarborough, the Houston teacher and parent, stepped outside the bounds of the new NES curriculum for the final time.

After the summer protest, Yarborough started the 2023-24 school year using the district’s mandated materials. But three months in, she had had enough of watching students in her English language arts class mentally check out from the monotony of the new structure: She read off district-created slides, and then students answered a multiple-choice question by holding up a markerboard where they scribbled an A, B, C or D. For short-answer questions, they wrote on an index card. Over and over, until it was time for a five-question quiz.

Would Miles or any of those board members send their child to an NES school? They would say, 'Oh, no. My kids need to be more challenged.'

“By November I was like, ‘I'm done with this,’” Yarborough recalls. “They're not learning. I know they can. I'm going to go back to a great lesson.”

For Native American Heritage Month, Yarborough decided to introduce her sixth graders to stories, poems and songs that fit the theme, despite them not being approved for use. Each time she rebelled by using a story or activity in class, even if an observing school administrator had liked the lesson, her supervisor would remind Yarborough the next day not to stray from the slides that were sent over by the district.

Eventually, an assistant principal called Yarborough into her office. She reminded Yarborough that the district’s orders barred teachers at NES-aligned schools like Navarro Middle from giving students quizzes, tests or any assessment outside of what was part of district-provided slideshows.

“It sounded kind of like a threat where she said, ‘I'm telling you before the [executive director] comes and tells you herself,’” Yarborough recalls. “‘You're going to be in big trouble with the ED herself if you don't start doing this now.’”

Yarborough quit her teaching job in January. She now works as a teacher in a nearby district, outside of the NES program. She couldn’t be part of a system that was forcing her to, as Yarborough puts it, treat students like machines.

“I knew they weren't learning. I knew I wasn't preparing them for anything in life besides a STAAR test,” Yarborough says, referencing the state’s annual standardized test, “and I was having to deny their humanity while we did that. I was so stressed, and my stomach was always a knot. I was like, ‘This is horrible. I can't keep doing this.’”

The slideshow model didn’t give her time to help students understand concepts before moving on, or for students to practice a skill on their own. The timed, jam-packed schedule didn’t even leave most kids with time to go to the bathroom, she says.

“They've just been holding up the whiteboard on the multiple-choice question slides, so they haven't been able to read a story and think through it and make mistakes and get feedback on their own,” Yarborough says. “So you have kids who will give up, and they just write any letter on their whiteboard, and it doesn't matter to them. And Mike Miles calls this engagement, but that's just obedience — because when a student is really engaged, it's their mind that's engaged, not their hand with a marker.”

Despite educators’ concerns, district leaders are riding high on data showing that some campuses made huge improvements in their overall accountability ratings — rising by 30 or more points, in some cases — during Miles’ first year at the helm. The district called the increases “remarkable” in a news release, noting the changes made under the New Education System.

While the state has been blocked from releasing annual school accountability scores, Houston ISD crunched the numbers itself and released its campuses’ preliminary scores. Wheatley High School, the source of low scores that triggered the state takeover, will increase from a “D” rating in 2023 to a “B” at the end of the 2024 academic year. The number of schools rated “A” and “B” will more than double during the same period, according to the district, while “D” and “F” campuses will fall to 41 schools in 2024 compared to 121 the previous year.

“We are incredibly proud of what we’ve been able to achieve in one year,” Miles said in the news release. “Together with our dedicated teachers, principals, and everyone at HISD, we will continue to provide high-quality instruction that builds on this growth.”

The first year of NES was turbulent, with a seemingly constant stream of new reforms. Protesters spoke out against the overhaul at public meetings, with plans for massive layoffs angering parents. Employee turnover during Miles’ tenure was 33 percent higher than the previous year.

Miles has remained cool under the barrage of criticism — including from a panel of graduating seniors who had firsthand experience under his New Education System. He brushed off the idea that a 9,000-student drop in enrollment was worrisome, telling the Houston Chronicle that the “numbers are changing every day ... but we feel confident that we’re going to keep growing in our enrollment until September.”

In the same article, a parent said her children had “hollow zombie faces” due to the stressful environment at their Houston ISD school. She opted to have them do virtual schooling this year.

As a parent, Yarborough wasn’t only troubled by how the superintendent’s test-centered plan changed school for the students she taught. Both of her children attended Pugh Elementary, part of the original cohort of NES schools, during the 2023-24 school year. She said her daughter’s fourth-grade class operated much like Yarborough was expected to run her sixth-grade class. Her son’s first-grade class wasn’t much different.

“My younger one would say, ‘Today's the same as every day,’” she recalls. “He said there wasn't the best part or the worst part. It wasn't good and it wasn't bad. It was just a flat line, like blah, every day.”

Yarborough found another school for her children — her son has specifically asked not to go back to Pugh Elementary for second grade. But to ensure she chose a school that’s beyond the reach of the New Education System, it meant looking at areas of the city that are wealthier.

Earlier this year, the district brought the total number of NES schools to 130 — nearly half of schools in the district — when it added 45 campuses to the NES roster.

“Miles is not going to target the schools where the parents have wealth and power, and that's concentrated in the schools with higher white populations,” Yarborough says. “And that's due to a legacy of racism.”

She feels bad about searching for schools based on the income level of their students’ families. But she doesn’t feel like she has a choice.

“Would Miles or any of those board members send their child to an NES school? They would say, ‘Oh, no. My kids need to be more challenged. My kids need a better social environment. My kids,’” Yarborough said. “They're giving our kids less. They're treating our kids differently. It's segregation.”

In aanloop naar een informele raad van Europese ministers van onderwijs en onderzoek, gaf de Tweede Kamer minister Bruins nog een boodschap over de drie procent-norm mee . 

GroenLinks-PvdA Kamerlid Joris Thijssen uitte zijn zorgen over de gevolgen van de bezuinigingen voor de Nederlandse innovatiekracht. “We hebben in Nederland een doelstelling om drie procent van ons bruto nationaal product te besteden aan onderzoek en innovatie. Nu bezuinigt dit kabinet heel erg veel geld op onderwijs, op innovatie en op onderzoek. Dat baart ons zorgen, want hoe kunnen we dan die doelstelling halen?”, wilde Thijssen weten. 

Stuur opties voor behalen drie procent-norm naar Kamer 

Hij verwees daarbij naar het deze week verschenen rapport van de voormalige president van de Europese Centrale Bank, Mario Draghi. Daarin bepleit hij meer investeringen in onderzoek en innovatie om het Europese concurrentievermogen te versterken. Zeker bij bestuurders in het hoger onderwijs zal dit op grote instemming kunnen rekenen, want Draghi stelt voor dat de Europese Unie honderden miljarden moet investeren in wetenschap en innovatie om niet verder achterop te raken bij de VS en China.  

Om het kabinet aan te sporen tot actie, diende Thijssen een motie in waarin hij de regering verzoekt “opties voor het behalen van deze norm in Nederland en de EU naar de Kamer te sturen.” Deze doelstelling is volgens de motie in overeenstemming met het deze week gepresenteerde rapport-Draghi. 

Zonder doorkijk roeien bij tegenwind 

Er wordt inderdaad bezuinigd in vergelijking met het vorige kabinet, maar er worden ook investeringen gedaan, wierp OCW-minister Eppo Bruins tegen. “Tegelijkertijd maakt de regering wel middelen vrij, bijvoorbeeld voor Invest-NL. Tevens wordt er ook de komende jaren uitvoering gegeven aan de reeds toegekende grote projecten binnen het Nationaal Groeifonds. We blijven ook inzetten op de Nationale Technologiestrategie, dus er gebeurt heel wat”, zei de minister. 

De wekelijkse nieuwsbrief is nog korte tijd gratis te ontvangen. De voorwaarden vindt u hier.

Bruins wilde echter niet vooruitlopen op de plannen die op Prinsjesdag bekend worden gemaakt, en ontraadde daarom de motie van Thijssen. “Die nadere invullingen krijgt de Kamer te horen op Prinsjesdag. Daar kan ik niet op vooruitlopen, dus ik wil op dit moment de motie ontraden, en eerst wachten totdat Prinsjesdag is geweest en we gaan kijken naar het verdere doorkijkje voor de komende jaren”, aldus de minister. 

Deze reactie leidde tot verbazing bij Thijssen, die de minister vroeg of dit betekende dat de drie procent-norm niet gehaald zou worden. Bruins sprak daarop in raadselachtige metaforen. “Het is verstandig om de drie procent-norm vast te houden. Ook bij tegenwind moet je blijven roeien en misschien wel een stukje harder roeien. Tegelijkertijd wordt er bezuinigd. Zo’n doorkijkje naar het halen van die drie procent zit er bij Prinsjesdag niet bij”, liet hij optekenen. 

Laten we eerlijk zijn over drie procent-norm 

Thijssen drong dan ook aan op meer duidelijkheid van de minister. “Laten we dan eerlijk tegen elkaar zijn: dan wordt de drie procent-norm gewoon niet gehaald. Ik probeer nu juist dit kabinet te verleiden om te zeggen: we bezuinigen meer dan twaalf miljard op onderwijs, onderzoek en innovatie, maar er zijn misschien ook wel andere manieren om die drie procent-norm te halen.” Die geruststelling kreeg hij echter niet. 

Vandaag wordt over de motie van Thijssen gestemd, en zal duidelijk worden met welke boodschap Bruins naar Brussel wordt gestuurd.  

The post “Laten we eerlijk zijn: de drie procent-norm wordt gewoon niet gehaald”  first appeared on ScienceGuide.

Het bericht “Laten we eerlijk zijn: de drie procent-norm wordt gewoon niet gehaald”  verscheen eerst op ScienceGuide.

SETDA

State Education Technology Directors Association (SETDA) just released The 2024 State EdTech Trends. The survey and report tracks insights on the top edtech priorities as identified in SETDA’s survey of state policy-makers including state edtech directors, state superintendents and commissioners of education and CIOs. “With every new report, it’s more evident that state education agencies are evolving to meet the demands of a digital, modern world while navigating the uncertainty created by emerging technologies like artificial intelligence,” says Julia Fallon, Executive Director of SETDA. Like its predecessors, the report catalogs ways state education agencies are adjusting to a world where technology is ubiquitous and where new and emerging innovations create never-before-seen opportunities and risks. Conducted in collaboration with Whiteboard Advisors, the report includes responses from 46 states and the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). The report complements the survey data with state spotlights that showcase the work states are leading to support cybersecurity efforts, the effective and equitable use of edtech tools, and the development of policy to guide the use of AI in K-12 classrooms. Learn more.

The post Report: 2024 State EdTech Trends appeared first on EdTech Digest.

Integrating technology into the classroom involves more than just adding gadgets and software; it’s about creating a dynamic learning environment where students are actively engaged and teachers can teach more effectively. This journey requires collaboration among technology teams, instructional coaches and educators.

Recently, EdSurge spoke with three educational leaders from Bourbonnais Elementary School District 53 in Illinois about their experiences with and strategies for using technology to enrich classroom environments. Caitlin Smith, the director of technology, has been in the K-12 educational technology space for 10 years. As the technology integration and support specialist, Kari Moulton brings 18 years of education experience to her work with teachers and staff to support technology integration. Amber Skeate, starting her 20th year in the classroom, serves on the technology committee and as technology leader at Alan B. Shepard Elementary School.

A District Perspective: Evaluating and Implementing New Technology

Technology plays a crucial role in classroom success, but integrating new tools can be challenging. Smith emphasizes the importance of addressing the big picture. "Being at the district level, I have to look at the challenges that hinder more than just one user," she explains. "I start by looking at where we have had the most issues coming from the end users (staff and students) or if the administration notices gaps in student growth." Smith’s approach ensures that the technology chosen benefits the entire district.

When evaluating new technology, Smith places a priority on solutions that are both easy to implement and cost-effective. "We discuss this in our technology leadership meetings and set up trials for each tech leader to test the technology," she says. This thorough vetting process ensures that the selected tools will effectively address the district’s needs. "Having both a technology integration specialist and a technology leadership committee allows the district to implement new technology throughout the year with the input of teachers along with my own staff’s recommendations," Smith adds, highlighting the importance of collaborative decision-making in tech integration.

A School Perspective: Rolling Out Technology to Teachers

Once new technology is selected, rolling it out successfully is the next challenge. Moulton plays a key role in this phase. "We do whatever it takes to support our teachers," Moulton shares. Her team provides a monthly newsletter with information about new tools, creates instructional videos and offers one-on-one training sessions. Her proactive support helps teachers feel confident and prepared to use new technology in their classrooms. Additionally, Moulton meets with new teachers at the start of the school year to give them an overview of the technology they will be using, ensuring that they are ready to integrate it into their teaching from day one.

“Having a supportive edtech company ensures that the adoption of the new tools is smooth,” Moulton adds, underscoring the importance of reliable vendor support in the tech adoption process. She points to Bourbonnais' implementation of Vivi, the classroom engagement and campus communications solution as an example. “Vivi made [our technology] rollout unique because they sent us two boxes to demo for eight weeks. This allowed us to have various teachers at all grade levels test out the solution and give us feedback.”

“One beneficial way that edtech companies have supported the tools that we have adopted is great communication and support,” shares Moulton. She highlights Vivi's exemplary support: “I have monthly meetings with my [customer success manager] to check in on how things are going, what is working and what we might need to troubleshoot. They also give out [usage] data. With budgets affecting a majority of schools, having the data to back up the usage of the tool is very important and beneficial in determining the future use of the tool.”

A Classroom Perspective: Transforming Classroom Experiences

In the classroom, technology can transform instruction and student engagement. "Technology is a huge part of my classroom atmosphere,” says Skeate. The students each have a laptop and can use approved apps for independent work during math and reading, allowing them to work at their instructional level while Skeate meets with small groups. Technology is also used to present concepts to the class. "The way I project my slide presentations, lessons and videos wouldn't happen without Vivi,” shares Skeate.

The ability to actively participate in lessons through technology fosters a more engaging and interactive classroom environment. “The students ask me every day if they are going to use the Vivi App so that they can be the teacher for the lesson,” Skeate excitedly states. Vivi's wireless screen mirroring allows the teacher to pass control of the classroom display to the students to share how they answer problems or write a word.

And engagement is not the only benefit. “Technology has been a lifesaver when it comes to honing in on instructional levels of all students through particular reading and math apps,” explains Skeate. In addition, technology can be a time-saver for teachers. "Vivi's Play Content feature allows me to line up all the videos I need for the day,” notes Skeate, which saves her time she would otherwise spend searching for materials. This efficiency enables her to focus more on teaching and less on administrative tasks, ultimately benefiting her students.

Recommended Resources:

• Tech Tips for Teachers: Find quick tech tips to enhance classroom engagement and efficiency.
• Customer Stories: See how school districts are using Vivi to enhance learning and reach their goals.
• Teacher Self-Care Checklist: Discover practical self-care tips to help teachers reduce stress and avoid burnout.
• Replacing Outdated Screen-Sharing Tech: Learn what to do when your screen-sharing technology reaches the end of its life.

Collaboration Is Key

The collaboration between district leaders, tech coaches and teachers at Bourbonnais showcases how technology can be seamlessly integrated to create engaging and efficient classroom environments. By focusing on comprehensive training and ongoing support while implementing interactive tools like Vivi, these educators are transforming their teaching and enhancing student learning experiences. The positive impact of technology on the instructional experience and classroom dynamics is evident, demonstrating that when implemented thoughtfully, technology can be a powerful tool in education.

Strategies for collaborative technology integration

For district-level staff: Carry out a proactive needs assessment / Carry out multi-level evaluations

For school-level staff: Provide multifaceted teacher support / Provide training geared toward new teachers / Seek edtech partner collaboration

For classroom-level staff: Provide tech-infused instruction / Offer student choice and control

See for yourself how Vivi transforms communication, boosts classroom engagement and simplifies IT management. Learn more at Vivi.io.

How to scale to new markets using pilots with international school operators.

GUEST COLUMN | by Michael Spencer

MAKSYM MAMCHUROV

It’s hard to ignore the ongoing macro market challenges in edtech right now: venture investing is at just 10% of peak 2021 levels, while K-12 budgets in the U.S. are facing a $65B revenue decline due to the ESSR funding cliff, declining enrollment and increasing labor costs.

At the same time, sales to schools has become ‘noisier’ as there are more and more K-12 startups selling products, while US school districts have cracked down after being inundated with sales offers and phishing scams that lead to ransomware attacks.

Global from the Get-Go

In this climate, the only viable route to success for edtech companies is adopting a global sales strategy from the get-go. 

‘In this climate, the only viable route to success for edtech companies is adopting a global sales strategy from the get-go.’

Over the years, I’ve spoken with many edtech founders about go-to-market and many of them have expressed a reluctance to expand and sell into international markets. They cite long sales cycles, high costs and low success rates among the reasons they don’t want to do it. After all, selling to U.S. schools and districts is challenging in the best of circumstances, so why extend that effort to geographical markets you know even less about? 

To Take Your Startup to the Next Level

However, the reality for many K-12 B2B founders, especially if they sell to U.S. school districts and/or organic growth has reached a saturation point, is that to take your startup to the next level, you need proactive early growth into international markets. As a long-time edtech executive turned early- to mid-stage investor, I believe that using channel partners to facilitate growth into thousands of untapped international school operators can be a highly successful way to scale your sales. Expanding into international markets while you’re trying to establish your company may sound daunting, but it’s often the simplest and fastest way to generate scalable, sustainable recurring revenue growth.

The Key is Pilots

So how do you put this into practice? The key is pilots. 

What are pilots?

Pilot programs aren’t the same as product demonstrations, or even beta tests. Conducted effectively, pilot programs can help schools and companies together weigh the potential value and impact of new education tools in ways that tests alone typically can’t.

This makes pilots a critical part of the K-12 sales process. They are also a common fail-point for vendors, something I call ‘pilot purgatory’ – prolonged pilots with no clearly defined expectations, measure of success or decision points that don’t then convert to paid customers. The majority of schools lack the resources, know-how, tools and processes to conduct effective edtech pilots, so to make this the cornerstone of a successful global growth strategy, you need to be prepared to take the lead.

What does a successful edtech pilot program look like? What pitfalls should you avoid?

Advantages of pilots

‘Fail fast’ is a famous philosophy among startup entrepreneurs. For product developers, this means rapid testing and re-development to find what solves your users’ pain points most effectively. When testing and evaluating edtech solutions, it is most valuable to do it in the classroom with real teachers and students. This enables:

• Feedback loops → the developer gets the most relevant feedback to support feature development by improving their understanding of how schools actually use technology and what the real needs of teachers, students and parents/carers are, as well as identifying potential challenges ahead of technology implementation. (For this reason, the famous accelerator Y-Combinator lists pilots as criteria in their guidelines for edtech products.)
• Educator buy-in → pilot programs increase communication between schools and companies, as teachers can see the tool in action and founders develop a deep understanding of the way schools really work, their challenges and roles. Enhanced communication and collaboration among stakeholders creates a more connected learning community.
• Evidence of efficacy → pilots are best practice to find product-market fit and pave the way to get VC funding. The biggest edtech-focused VCs, such as Reach Capital, guide companies to build their own efficacy portfolio.

Overcoming challenges for a successful pilot

1. Identify need – Clearly articulate the specific challenge your solution is trying to address so you can clearly communicate the value you will add to a school’s day-to-day operations. Exploring international markets doesn’t require a shift in mission, values, or approach. Students globally all face the same challenges – all that’s required to succeed in the international market is a strategic channel partner or school operator who knows what works and what they need to maximize your impact, to do your due diligence, and to ensure solutions are presented in a manner that the local market needs.

2. Plan – Agree with the school upon specific pilot objectives to ensure a shared vision and identify data that will be used to determine success. Set agreements with the school that outline roles and responsibilities, timelines and how results will be used.

3. Train and implement – Ensure teachers have training and tech support to enable strong implementation of your solution. Take a high-touch approach to onboarding students.

4. Collect data – Collect quantitative and qualitative data so you can determine whether the pilot objectives are being met. Create formal opportunities (such as surveys, focus groups and post-pilot debriefs) for teachers and students to give feedback. Send usage updates to the school regularly throughout the pilot.

5. Analyze and decide – Analyze collected data to evaluate whether the edtech tool met the pilot objectives.You can pilot something, but without a benchmark and post-pilot review, it is useless. Work with the school to understand and negotiate the total cost of implementing the edtech tool. (Consider ongoing costs for licensing, installation, training and tech support.)

—

Michael E. Spencer is founder and CEO of Global Expansion Strategies supporting founders and schools with all aspects of the pilot process. To date, 100% of GES pilots have gone on to full implementation, with significant impacts on student outcomes. Connect with Michael on LinkedIn. 

The post Supercharge Your Edtech Startup appeared first on EdTech Digest.

Het vandaag verschenen jaarlijkse onderzoek “Education at a Glance 2024” van de Organisatie voor Economische Samenwerking en Ontwikkeling (OESO) vergelijkt de prestaties van het Nederlandse hoger onderwijs met dat van andere landen. Het Nederlandse hoger onderwijs is relatief duur en reproduceert meer ongelijkheid dan in veel andere landen het geval is, toont het rapport.  

Hoewel het Nederlandse onderwijs over de breedte relatief goed presteert op het gebied van gelijke kansen, zijn er duidelijke aandachtspunten, vooral waar dat de toegankelijkheid en het studiesucces in het hoger onderwijs betreft. 

OESO: Studenten met migratieachtergrond op forse achterstand 

Een migratieachtergrond verkleint de kans dat iemand in Nederland succesvol een hbo- of wo-opleiding afrondt, toont het onderzoek. Nederlandse studenten die tot een eerste- of tweede generatie migranten behoren, ronden hun hbo- of wo-opleiding aanzienlijk minder vaak af (respectievelijk 54 procent en 55 procent) dan de overige studenten (73 procent). 

Daarnaast speelt het opleidingsniveau van de ouders een significante rol bij het studiesucces van een student. Studenten wier ouders geen mbo- of havo/vwo-diploma hebben behaald, voltooiden hun hbo- of wo-opleiding slechts in 58 procent van de gevallen. Dit staat in schril contrast met kinderen van ouders met een hbo- of wo-diploma, die in 76 procent van de gevallen hun opleiding afrondden.  

Ook minister Bruins ziet dat Nederland een “negatieve uitschieter” vormt bij het vergelijk tussen verschillende groepen studenten, zegt hij in een reactie. “Het hbo en wo [blijkt] niet voor iedereen even toegankelijk.” 

Nederland zeer succesvol in internationalisering, ziet OESO 

Het Nederlandse hoger onderwijs is wel zeer aantrekkelijk voor internationale studenten, toont het rapport. In 2022 was 17 procent van alle studenten in Nederland afkomstig uit het buitenland, een aanzienlijke stijging van zeven procentpunt sinds 2013. Dit percentage ligt ver boven het OESO-gemiddelde van zes procent. Elders is men dan ook jaloers op Nederland, zegt de OESO. “Veel landen proberen internationaal mobiele studenten in het hoger onderwijs aan te trekken, omdat zij vaak hogere collegegelden betalen en, indien ze besluiten na hun afstuderen in het land te blijven, waardevolle vaardigheden aan de arbeidsmarkt toevoegen.” 

De wekelijkse nieuwsbrief is nog korte tijd gratis te ontvangen. De voorwaarden vindt u hier.

Het onderzoek belicht ook de financiële investering in het hoger onderwijs. Nederland besteedt gemiddeld 23.864 USD per student in het vervolgonderwijs, wat aanzienlijk hoger is dan het OESO-gemiddelde. Landen zoals Denemarken zitten op een vergelijkbaar niveau, maar in Italië ligt dit bedrag maar liefst 10.000 USD lager. Landen met een nog lagere publieke investering per student zijn de VS en het VK, waar studenten zelf veel meer moeten bijdragen. Deze grote publieke investering in het hoger onderwijs weerspiegelt volgens de OESO de prioriteit die Nederland geeft aan de kwaliteit van het hoger onderwijs en onderzoek. 

Eigen bijdrage in hoger onderwijs kan drempel vormen 

Toch is de financiële bijdrage in het hbo en wo aanzienlijk wanneer die wordt vergeleken met het voorbereidend onderwijs. Daar ligt de eigen bijdrage op 1 procent, terwijl dit in het hoger onderwijs dertien procent is. Dat beïnvloedt de financiële toegankelijkheid van het hoger onderwijs. 

“Dit is een teken dat een financiële bijdrage een drempel kan vormen om te participeren in bepaalde typen onderwijs”, reageert Bruins. Als het voorgenomen beleid van de NSC-minister verwerkelijkt wordt, zal dit percentage door de langstudeerboete echter nog aanzienlijk kunnen toenemen. 

Leven lang leren voor veel groepen onbereikbaar 

De minister wijst ook op de uitdagingen voor volwassenen die zich willen blijven ontwikkelen via formeel of informeel onderwijs. Voor 53 procent van de volwassenen tussen de 25 en 64 jaar vormen aanvullende kosten een probleem bij het volgen van onderwijs. Dat is het hoogste percentage binnen de OESO. “Ook hier geldt dat de financiële, maar ook logistieke redenen vanuit de thuissituatie erg bepalend zijn voor de mate waarin volwassenen zich kunnen blijven ontwikkelen”, zegt de minister.  

Hoewel Nederland het vanuit internationaal perspectief goed doet op het gebied van gelijkwaardigheid in het onderwijs, zijn er nog steeds belangrijke knelpunten in het hoger onderwijs, concludeert Bruins. De toegankelijkheid en het studiesucces voor bepaalde groepen studenten blijven volgens hem aandachtspunten, evenals de financiële drempels voor deelname aan hoger onderwijs en volwasseneneducatie.

The post Nederlands hoger onderwijs “negatieve uitschieter” op kansengelijkheid, toont OESO-rapport  first appeared on ScienceGuide.

Het bericht Nederlands hoger onderwijs “negatieve uitschieter” op kansengelijkheid, toont OESO-rapport  verscheen eerst op ScienceGuide.

The choices we make today will have lasting impacts. 

GUEST COLUMN | by Jeff Faust and Melissa Loble

AI is dominating conversations in public education and is all but certain to be a key theme at education conferences for the foreseeable future. The choices we make today will have lasting impacts on our profession, our institutions, our leaders, our teachers, and most importantly, our students. While it’s important to avoid hype and futurism, doing nothing is risky. The rapid development of AI requires action, as we are already experiencing economic and professional impacts across industries with a rate of change almost certain to further accelerate.

‘The rapid development of AI requires action, as we are already experiencing economic and professional impacts across industries with a rate of change almost certain to further accelerate.’

‘We’ve Opened Up the Gate’

In a recent Instructure-hosted webinar focused on the role of AI schools, high school teacher Paul Satchwill explained the changing technological landscape succinctly: “We’ve opened up this gate…and there’s not a lot of direction.” While the potential of AI is immense, the lack of clear guidance and understanding poses significant challenges. As with any edtech, districts are worried about data privacy protections for both their teachers and students. The information provided by AI can’t always be trusted. Algorithms can perpetuate the biases of the humans who created them. Faulty models can also lead to data hallucinations –  incorrect or misleading results generated by the AI. But as the saying goes, “knowledge is power”, and with the increase in knowledge, comes the ability to overcome these issues.

Vendors need to be open with administrators regarding many data privacy concerns. Instructure, for example, is providing its clients with “nutrition fact sheets” that highlight the imperative information about its products. Districts can also use products, such as LearnPlatform by Instructure, to assess whether these AI products meet evidence-backed standards. With increased AI literacy, users will also know the best use cases for AI and how it applies to their classroom experience. 

Crucial Role of Schools 

Schools play a crucial role in addressing this by providing comprehensive education and training around AI for both teachers and students. This includes developing AI literacy programs, establishing clear expectations for AI use, and fostering open communication about its implications. Schools are uniquely equipped to foster open communication and collaboration with their communities through community conversations focused on AI. 

Schools can highlight the steps they are taking to responsibly incorporate AI, including the development of AI literacy programs, the establishment of clear guidelines for AI use, and ongoing professional development for staff. 

By proactively engaging parents, educators, and community members in these conversations, schools can build trust, address concerns, and ensure that AI integration aligns with the values and goals of the community. This collaborative approach not only promotes transparency but also empowers stakeholders to actively participate in shaping the future of AI in education.

Immense Promise 

The integration of AI in education holds immense promise for transforming teaching and learning experiences. AI has the potential to revolutionize education by offering personalized learning journeys, optimizing efficiency, and sparking creativity. By leveraging AI’s capabilities, schools can create a dynamic environment where each student receives tailored support, teachers can dedicate more time to inspiring students, and learning becomes an engaging and immersive adventure. AI-powered feedback enables educators to provide real-time insights, nurturing students’ abilities to think critically and become self-directed learners. 

AI has the potential to be a valuable tool for overcoming writer’s block and creativity challenges, enabling users to quickly generate ideas and content, save time, and “visually bring things to life” even without prior graphical expertise. However, it should be used as an aid rather than a replacement for human creativity. Through this practice, we can prioritize critical thinking, creativity, and adaptability in education and empower learners to excel in a world alongside AI.

Embracing the Potential 

AI will have lasting impacts on education, and its potential to enhance teaching and learning is vast. We should accept that leveraging AI to increase efficacy or to be the best educator possible is not cheating; rather, it’s a strategic move toward preparing ourselves and our students for the future. Schools must embrace this reality and begin exploring, training, and integrating AI tools purposefully and strategically. 

By leveraging industry partners, experts, and thought leaders in the field, schools can navigate this complex landscape with confidence, ensuring that AI is both effective and responsible. As we embark on this journey, let us embrace the potential of AI to create an education system that empowers every learner to reach their full potential in a future world that is all but guaranteed  to look vastly different from the world we know today.

—

Jeff Faust is Chief Technology Officer for Chesapeake Public Schools. Connect with Jeff on LinkedIn. Melissa Loble is Chief Academic Officer at Instructure. Connect with Melissa on LinkedIn.

The post The Biggest Risk in Education: Doing Nothing About AI appeared first on EdTech Digest.